G. Puixeu Sala, M. Pickup, D. Field, and S. C. H. Barrett, “Data from: Variation in sexual dimorphism in a wind-pollinated plant: the influence of geographical context and life-cycle dynamics.” Dryad, 2019.

O. P. Hauser, C. Hilbe, K. Chatterjee, and M. A. Nowak, “Social dilemmas among unequals,” Nature, vol. 572, no. 7770. Springer Nature, pp. 524–527, 2019.

N. Picco et al., “A mathematical insight into cell labelling experiments for clonal analysis,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 235, no. 3. Wiley, pp. 686–696, 2019.

G. Sella and N. H. Barton, “Thinking about the evolution of complex traits in the era of genome-wide association studies,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 20. Annual Reviews, pp. 461–493, 2019.

K. Mysliwy and M. Napiórkowski, “Thermodynamics of inhomogeneous imperfect quantum gases in harmonic traps,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2019, no. 6. IOP Publishing, 2019.

G. P. Gehér, T. Titkos, and D. Virosztek, “On isometric embeddings of Wasserstein spaces – the discrete case,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 480, no. 2. Elsevier, 2019.

K. N. Destagnol and E. Sofos, “Rational points and prime values of polynomials in moderately many variables,” Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques, vol. 156, no. 11. Elsevier, 2019.

M. Fenu et al., “A novel magnet-based scratch method for standardisation of wound-healing assays,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1. Springer Nature, 2019.

N. H. Barton, “Is speciation driven by cycles of mixing and isolation?,” National Science Review, vol. 6, no. 2. Oxford University Press, pp. 291–292, 2019.

N. Byczkowicz et al., “HCN channel-mediated neuromodulation can control action potential velocity and fidelity in central axons,” eLife, vol. 8. eLife Sciences Publications, 2019.

Q. Zhu, M. Gallemi, J. Pospísil, P. dádníková, M. Strnad, and E. Benková, “Root gravity response module guides differential growth determining both root bending and apical hook formation in Arabidopsis,” Development, vol. 146, no. 17. The Company of Biologists, 2019.

O. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 11 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 10 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 20 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 15 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 16 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 17 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 18 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 19 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.

O. M. Sigalova et al., “Additional file 1 of Chlamydia pan-genomic analysis reveals balance between host adaptation and selective pressure to genome reduction.” Springer Nature, 2019.