@techreport{20146, abstract = {This criteria catalogue and the accompanying assessment questions were developed by a working group of KEMÖ (Kooperation E-Medien Österreich, the Austrian Academic Library Consortium). They are intended to support research institutions and organisations in the evaluation of Open Science Infrastructures. The 20 criteria outlined in the catalogue provide a structured basis for making informed decisions regarding the financial support of these infrastructures. The assessment questions are intended to be completed by Open Science Infrastructures and can be shared with them accordingly.}, author = {Gredler, Paul and Kaier, Christian and Danowski, Patrick and Zoyer, Michael and Rieck, Katharina and Ferus, Andreas and Rosenberger, Elisabeth and Löffler, Alexander and Hofer, Lisa and Still, Laura}, publisher = {Zenodo}, title = {{Catalogue of criteria for assessing the funding eligibility of Open Science infrastructures}}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.15269364}, year = {2025}, } @article{11444, abstract = {This article investigates library-related documents written by Gerard van Swieten (1700–72) during his tenure as Library Prefect in the Imperial Library of Vienna (1745–72). Van Swieten’s time as Library Prefect is considered through a textual analysis. Handwritten letters were deconstructed in terms of their appearance, layout, and tone in order to mine them for meaning. Furthermore, the contents were examined for library matters such as censorship, catalogues, and collection development. The Imperial Court Library held a prominent role as a repository for rare and valuable works, later becoming the National Library of Austria. Gerard van Swieten’s work as a librarian tends to be overlooked, perhaps because he is better known as the private physician of Maria Theresia, as well as a medical reformer. Nevertheless, he was a hard-working chief librarian deeply involved in all aspects of librarianship. Van Swieten endorsed modern scientific works, which were otherwise banned officially by the censorship commission, for the use of scholars in the library, expanded the collection by acquiring books through his network of scholars and publishers, and reissued library catalogues. He also provided for the comfort of users in the library reading room, at a time when such considerations were unusual. In conclusion, a proposal is made that van Swieten viewed his role as librarian with some importance and pride.}, author = {Chlebak, Clara A and Reid, Peter H.}, issn = {1758-3497}, journal = {Library and Information History}, number = {1}, pages = {23--41}, publisher = {Edinburgh University Press}, title = {{From the prefect’s desk: Gerard van Swieten’s library correspondence}}, doi = {10.3366/lih.2022.0097}, volume = {38}, year = {2022}, } @techreport{8695, abstract = {A look at international activities on Open Science reveals a broad spectrum from individual institutional policies to national action plans. The present Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria are based on these international initiatives and present practical considerations for their coordinated implementation with regard to strategic developments in research, technology and innovation (RTI) in Austria until 2030. They are addressed to all relevant actors in the RTI system, in particular to Research Performing Organisations, Research Funding Organisations, Research Policy, memory institutions such as Libraries and Researchers. The recommendation paper was developed from 2018 to 2020 by the OANA working group "Open Science Strategy" and published for the first time in spring 2020 for a public consultation. The now available final version of the recommendation document, which contains feedback and comments from the consultation, is intended to provide an impetus for further discussion and implementation of Open Science in Austria and serves as a contribution and basis for a potential national Open Science Strategy in Austria. The document builds on the diverse expertise of the authors (academia, administration, library and archive, information technology, science policy, funding system, etc.) and reflects their personal experiences and opinions.}, author = {Mayer, Katja and Rieck, Katharina and Reichmann, Stefan and Danowski, Patrick and Graschopf, Anton and König, Thomas and Kraker, Peter and Lehner, Patrick and Reckling, Falk and Ross-Hellauer, Tony and Spichtinger, Daniel and Tzatzanis, Michalis and Schürz, Stefanie}, pages = {36}, publisher = {OANA}, title = {{Empfehlungen für eine nationale Open Science Strategie in Österreich / Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria}}, doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.4109242}, year = {2020}, } @article{7687, abstract = {A working group, which was established within the Network of Repository Managers (RepManNet), has dealt with common certifications for repositories. In addition, current requirements of the research funding agencies FWF and EU were also taken into account. The Core Trust Seal was examined in more detail. For this purpose, a questionnaire was sent to those organizations that are already certified with CTS in Austria. The answers were summarized and evaluated anonymously. It is recommended to go for a repository certification. Moreover, the development of a DINI certificate in Austria is strongly suggested.}, author = {Ernst, Doris and Novotny, Gertraud and Schönher, Eva Maria}, issn = {1022-2588}, journal = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, number = {1}, pages = {46--59}, publisher = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, title = {{(Core Trust) Seal your repository!}}, doi = {10.31263/voebm.v73i1.3491}, volume = {73}, year = {2020}, } @article{8706, abstract = {As part of the Austrian Transition to Open Access (AT2OA) project, subproject TP1-B is working on designing a monitoring solution for the output of Open Access publications in Austria. This report on a potential Open Access monitoring approach in Austria is one of the results of these efforts and can serve as a basis for discussion on an international level.}, author = {Danowski, Patrick and Ferus, Andreas and Hikl, Anna-Laetitia and McNeill, Gerda and Miniberger, Clemens and Reding, Steve and Zarka, Tobias and Zojer, Michael}, issn = {1022-2588}, journal = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, number = {2}, pages = {278--284}, publisher = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, title = {{„Recommendation“ for the further procedure for open access monitoring. Deliverable of the AT2OA subproject TP1-B}}, doi = {10.31263/voebm.v73i2.3941}, volume = {73}, year = {2020}, } @article{6657, abstract = {In this article a model is described how Open Access definitions can be formed on the basis of objective criteria. The common Open Access definitions such as "gold" and "green" are not exactly defined. This becomes a problem as soon as one begins to measure Open Access, for example if the development of the Open Access share should be monitored. This was discussed in the working group on Open Access Monitoring of the AT2OA project and the present model was developed, which is based on 5 critics with 4 characteristics: location, licence, version, embargo and conditions of the Open Access publication are taken into account. In the meantime, the model has also been tested in practice using R scripts, and the initial results are quite promising.}, author = {Danowski, Patrick}, issn = {1022-2588}, journal = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, number = {1}, pages = {59--65}, publisher = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, title = {{An Austrian proposal for the classification of Open Access Tuples (COAT) - distinguish different open access types beyond colors}}, doi = {10.31263/voebm.v72i1.2276}, volume = {72}, year = {2019}, } @article{53, abstract = {In 2013, a publication repository was implemented at IST Austria and 2015 after a thorough preparation phase a data repository was implemented - both based on the Open Source Software EPrints. In this text, designed as field report, we will reflect on our experiences with Open Source Software in general and specifically with EPrints regarding technical aspects but also regarding their characteristics of the user community. The second part is a pleading for including the end users in the process of implementation, adaption and evaluation.}, author = {Petritsch, Barbara and Porsche, Jana}, journal = {VÖB Mitteilungen}, number = {1}, pages = {199 -- 206}, publisher = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare}, title = {{IST PubRep and IST DataRep: the institutional repositories at IST Austria}}, doi = {10.31263/voebm.v71i1.1993}, volume = {71}, year = {2018}, } @techreport{5686, author = {Danowski, Patrick}, pages = {5}, title = {{An Austrian proposal for the Classification of Open Access Tuples (COAT) - Distinguish different Open Access types beyond colors}}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.1244154}, year = {2018}, } @misc{6459, author = {Petritsch, Barbara}, keywords = {Open Access, Publication Analysis}, location = {Graz, Austria}, publisher = {IST Austria}, title = {{Open Access at IST Austria 2009-2017}}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.1410279}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5577, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at Emerald from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Emerald Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:89}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5578, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at IOP from 2012-2015 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{IOP Austrian Publications 2012-2015}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:90}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5574, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and publisher's data on Austrian publication output at IOP. }, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check IOP Scopus vs. Publisher}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:86}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5579, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at RSC from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{RSC Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:91}, year = {2018}, } @phdthesis{278, abstract = {Consortial subscription contracts regulate the digital access to publications between publishers and scientific libraries. However, since a couple of years the tendency towards a freely accessible publishing (Open Access) intensifies. As a consequence of this trend the contractual relationship between licensor and licensee is gradually changing as well: More and more contracts exercise influence on open access publishing. The present study attempts to compare Austrian examples of consortial licence contracts, which include components of open access. It describes the difference between pure subscription contracts and differing innovative deals including open access components. Thereby it becomes obvious that for the evaluation of this licence contracts new methods are needed. An essential new element of such analyses is the evaluation of the open access publication numbers. So this study tries to carry out such publication analyses for Austrian open access deals focusing on quantitative questions: How does the number of publications evolve? How does the open access share change? Publications reports of the publishers and database queries from Scopus form the data basis. The analysis of the data points out that differing approaches of contracts result in highly divergent results: Particular deals can prioritize a saving in costs or else the increase of the open access rate. It is to be assumed that within the following years further numerous open access deals will be negotiated. The finding of this study shall provide guidance.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, pages = {94}, publisher = {Universität Wien}, title = {{Lizenzverträge mit Open-Access-Komponenten an österreichischen Bibliotheken}}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5582, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at Taylor&Francis from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Taylor&Francis Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:94}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5581, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at Springer from 2013-2016 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Springer Austrian Publications 2013-2016}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:93}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5580, abstract = {Data on Austrian open access publication output at SAGE from 2013-2017 including data analysis.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{SAGE Austrian Publications 2013-2017}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:92}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5576, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and FWF's data on Austrian publication output at T&F.}, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check T&F Scopus vs. FWF}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:88}, year = {2018}, } @misc{5575, abstract = {Comparison of Scopus' and FWF's data on Austrian publication output at RSC. }, author = {Villányi, Márton}, keywords = {Publication analysis, Bibliography, Open Access}, publisher = {Institute of Science and Technology Austria}, title = {{Data Check RSC Scopus vs. FWF}}, doi = {10.15479/AT:ISTA:87}, year = {2018}, } @inproceedings{18286, abstract = {We introduce a new framework for learning dense correspondence between deformable 3D shapes. Existing learning based approaches model shape correspondence as a labelling problem, where each point of a query shape receives a label identifying a point on some reference domain; the correspondence is then constructed a posteriori by composing the label predictions of two input shapes. We propose a paradigm shift and design a structured prediction model in the space of functional maps, linear operators that provide a compact representation of the correspondence. We model the learning process via a deep residual network which takes dense descriptor fields defined on two shapes as input, and outputs a soft map between the two given objects. The resulting correspondence is shown to be accurate on several challenging benchmarks comprising multiple categories, synthetic models, real scans with acquisition artifacts, topological noise, and partiality.}, author = {Litany, Or and Remez, Tal and Rodola, Emanuele and Bronstein, Alexander and Bronstein, Michael}, booktitle = {2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, issn = {9781538610329}, publisher = {IEEE}, title = {{Deep functional maps: Structured prediction for dense shape correspondence}}, doi = {10.1109/iccv.2017.603}, volume = {31}, year = {2017}, }