@inproceedings{1541,
  abstract     = {We present XSpeed a parallel state-space exploration algorithm for continuous systems with linear dynamics and nondeterministic inputs. The motivation of having parallel algorithms is to exploit the computational power of multi-core processors to speed-up performance. The parallelization is achieved on two fronts. First, we propose a parallel implementation of the support function algorithm by sampling functions in parallel. Second, we propose a parallel state-space exploration by slicing the time horizon and computing the reachable states in the time slices in parallel. The second method can be however applied only to a class of linear systems with invertible dynamics and fixed input. A GP-GPU implementation is also presented following a lazy evaluation strategy on support functions. The parallel algorithms are implemented in the tool XSpeed. We evaluated the performance on two benchmarks including an 28 dimension Helicopter model. Comparison with the sequential counterpart shows a maximum speed-up of almost 7× on a 6 core, 12 thread Intel Xeon CPU E5-2420 processor. Our GP-GPU implementation shows a maximum speed-up of 12× over the sequential implementation and 53× over SpaceEx (LGG scenario), the state of the art tool for reachability analysis of linear hybrid systems. Experiments illustrate that our parallel algorithm with time slicing not only speeds-up performance but also improves precision.},
  author       = {Ray, Rajarshi and Gurung, Amit and Das, Binayak and Bartocci, Ezio and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Grosu, Radu},
  location     = {Haifa, Israel},
  pages        = {3 -- 18},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{XSpeed: Accelerating reachability analysis on multi-core processors}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-26287-1_1},
  volume       = {9434},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1594,
  abstract     = {Quantitative extensions of temporal logics have recently attracted significant attention. In this work, we study frequency LTL (fLTL), an extension of LTL which allows to speak about frequencies of events along an execution. Such an extension is particularly useful for probabilistic systems that often cannot fulfil strict qualitative guarantees on the behaviour. It has been recently shown that controller synthesis for Markov decision processes and fLTL is decidable when all the bounds on frequencies are 1. As a step towards a complete quantitative solution, we show that the problem is decidable for the fragment fLTL\GU, where U does not occur in the scope of G (but still F can). Our solution is based on a novel translation of such quantitative formulae into equivalent deterministic automata.},
  author       = {Forejt, Vojtěch and Krčál, Jan and Kretinsky, Jan},
  location     = {Suva, Fiji},
  pages        = {162 -- 177},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Controller synthesis for MDPs and frequency LTL\GU}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-662-48899-7_12},
  volume       = {9450},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1601,
  abstract     = {We propose a flexible exchange format for ω-automata, as typically used in formal verification, and implement support for it in a range of established tools. Our aim is to simplify the interaction of tools, helping the research community to build upon other people’s work. A key feature of the format is the use of very generic acceptance conditions, specified by Boolean combinations of acceptance primitives, rather than being limited to common cases such as Büchi, Streett, or Rabin. Such flexibility in the choice of acceptance conditions can be exploited in applications, for example in probabilistic model checking, and furthermore encourages the development of acceptance-agnostic tools for automata manipulations. The format allows acceptance conditions that are either state-based or transition-based, and also supports alternating automata.},
  author       = {Babiak, Tomáš and Blahoudek, František and Duret Lutz, Alexandre and Klein, Joachim and Kretinsky, Jan and Mueller, Daniel and Parker, David and Strejček, Jan},
  location     = {San Francisco, CA, United States},
  pages        = {479 -- 486},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{The Hanoi omega-automata format}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-21690-4_31},
  volume       = {9206},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1603,
  abstract     = {For deterministic systems, a counterexample to a property can simply be an error trace, whereas counterexamples in probabilistic systems are necessarily more complex. For instance, a set of erroneous traces with a sufficient cumulative probability mass can be used. Since these are too large objects to understand and manipulate, compact representations such as subchains have been considered. In the case of probabilistic systems with non-determinism, the situation is even more complex. While a subchain for a given strategy (or scheduler, resolving non-determinism) is a straightforward choice, we take a different approach. Instead, we focus on the strategy itself, and extract the most important decisions it makes, and present its succinct representation.
The key tools we employ to achieve this are (1) introducing a concept of importance of a state w.r.t. the strategy, and (2) learning using decision trees. There are three main consequent advantages of our approach. Firstly, it exploits the quantitative information on states, stressing the more important decisions. Secondly, it leads to a greater variability and degree of freedom in representing the strategies. Thirdly, the representation uses a self-explanatory data structure. In summary, our approach produces more succinct and more explainable strategies, as opposed to e.g. binary decision diagrams. Finally, our experimental results show that we can extract several rules describing the strategy even for very large systems that do not fit in memory, and based on the rules explain the erroneous behaviour.},
  author       = {Brázdil, Tomáš and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Chmelik, Martin and Fellner, Andreas and Kretinsky, Jan},
  location     = {San Francisco, CA, United States},
  pages        = {158 -- 177},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Counterexample explanation by learning small strategies in Markov decision processes}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-21690-4_10},
  volume       = {9206},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1605,
  abstract     = {Multiaffine hybrid automata (MHA) represent a powerful formalism to model complex dynamical systems. This formalism is particularly suited for the representation of biological systems which often exhibit highly non-linear behavior. In this paper, we consider the problem of parameter identification for MHA. We present an abstraction of MHA based on linear hybrid automata, which can be analyzed by the SpaceEx model checker. This abstraction enables a precise handling of time-dependent properties. We demonstrate the potential of our approach on a model of a genetic regulatory network and a myocyte model.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Schilling, Christian and Bartocci, Ezio and Batt, Grégory and Kong, Hui and Grosu, Radu},
  location     = {Haifa, Israel},
  pages        = {19 -- 35},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Abstraction-based parameter synthesis for multiaffine systems}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-26287-1_2},
  volume       = {9434},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1606,
  abstract     = {In this paper, we present the first steps toward a runtime verification framework for monitoring hybrid and cyber-physical systems (CPS) development tools based on randomized differential testing. The development tools include hybrid systems reachability analysis tools, model-based development environments like Simulink/Stateflow (SLSF), etc. First, hybrid automaton models are randomly generated. Next, these hybrid automaton models are translated to a number of different tools (currently, SpaceEx, dReach, Flow*, HyCreate, and the MathWorks’ Simulink/Stateflow) using the HyST source transformation and translation tool. Then, the hybrid automaton models are executed in the different tools and their outputs are parsed. The final step is the differential comparison: the outputs of the different tools are compared. If the results do not agree (in the sense that an analysis or verification result from one tool does not match that of another tool, ignoring timeouts, etc.), a candidate bug is flagged and the model is saved for future analysis by the user. The process then repeats and the monitoring continues until the user terminates the process. We present preliminary results that have been useful in identifying a few bugs in the analysis methods of different development tools, and in an earlier version of HyST.},
  author       = {Nguyen, Luan and Schilling, Christian and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Johnson, Taylor},
  booktitle    = {6th International Conference},
  isbn         = {978-3-319-23819-7},
  location     = {Vienna, Austria},
  pages        = {281 -- 286},
  publisher    = {Springer Nature},
  title        = {{Runtime verification for hybrid analysis tools}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_19},
  volume       = {9333},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1658,
  abstract     = {Continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC) models have become a central tool for understanding the dynamics of complex reaction networks and the importance of stochasticity in the underlying biochemical processes. When such models are employed to answer questions in applications, in order to ensure that the model provides a sufficiently accurate representation of the real system, it is of vital importance that the model parameters are inferred from real measured data. This, however, is often a formidable task and all of the existing methods fail in one case or the other, usually because the underlying CTMC model is high-dimensional and computationally difficult to analyze. The parameter inference methods that tend to scale best in the dimension of the CTMC are based on so-called moment closure approximations. However, there exists a large number of different moment closure approximations and it is typically hard to say a priori which of the approximations is the most suitable for the inference procedure. Here, we propose a moment-based parameter inference method that automatically chooses the most appropriate moment closure method. Accordingly, contrary to existing methods, the user is not required to be experienced in moment closure techniques. In addition to that, our method adaptively changes the approximation during the parameter inference to ensure that always the best approximation is used, even in cases where different approximations are best in different regions of the parameter space.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Henzinger, Thomas A and Podelski, Andreas and Ruess, Jakob and Schilling, Christian},
  location     = {Nantes, France},
  pages        = {77 -- 89},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Adaptive moment closure for parameter inference of biochemical reaction networks}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-23401-4_8},
  volume       = {9308},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1659,
  abstract     = {The target discounted-sum problem is the following: Given a rational discount factor 0 &lt; λ &lt; 1 and three rational values a, b, and t, does there exist a finite or an infinite sequence w ε(a, b)∗ or w ε(a, b)w, such that Σ|w| i=0 w(i)λi equals t? The problem turns out to relate to many fields of mathematics and computer science, and its decidability question is surprisingly hard to solve. We solve the finite version of the problem, and show the hardness of the infinite version, linking it to various areas and open problems in mathematics and computer science: β-expansions, discounted-sum automata, piecewise affine maps, and generalizations of the Cantor set. We provide some partial results to the infinite version, among which are solutions to its restriction to eventually-periodic sequences and to the cases that λ λ 1/2 or λ = 1/n, for every n ε N. We use our results for solving some open problems on discounted-sum automata, among which are the exact-value problem for nondeterministic automata over finite words and the universality and inclusion problems for functional automata.},
  author       = {Boker, Udi and Henzinger, Thomas A and Otop, Jan},
  booktitle    = {LICS},
  issn         = {1043-6871 },
  location     = {Kyoto, Japan},
  pages        = {750 -- 761},
  publisher    = {IEEE},
  title        = {{The target discounted-sum problem}},
  doi          = {10.1109/LICS.2015.74},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1670,
  abstract     = {Planning in hybrid domains poses a special challenge due to the involved mixed discrete-continuous dynamics. A recent solving approach for such domains is based on applying model checking techniques on a translation of PDDL+ planning problems to hybrid automata. However, the proposed translation is limited because must behavior is only overapproximated, and hence, processes and events are not reflected exactly. In this paper, we present the theoretical foundation of an exact PDDL+ translation. We propose a schema to convert a hybrid automaton with must transitions into an equivalent hybrid automaton featuring only may transitions.},
  author       = {Bogomolov, Sergiy and Magazzeni, Daniele and Minopoli, Stefano and Wehrle, Martin},
  location     = {Jerusalem, Israel},
  pages        = {42 -- 46},
  publisher    = {AAAI Press},
  title        = {{PDDL+ planning with hybrid automata: Foundations of translating must behavior}},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1680,
  abstract     = {We consider the satisfiability problem for modal logic over first-order definable classes of frames.We confirm the conjecture from Hemaspaandra and Schnoor [2008] that modal logic is decidable over classes definable by universal Horn formulae. We provide a full classification of Horn formulae with respect to the complexity of the corresponding satisfiability problem. It turns out, that except for the trivial case of inconsistent formulae, local satisfiability is eitherNP-complete or PSPACE-complete, and global satisfiability is NP-complete, PSPACE-complete, or ExpTime-complete. We also show that the finite satisfiability problem for modal logic over Horn definable classes of frames is decidable. On the negative side, we show undecidability of two related problems. First, we exhibit a simple universal three-variable formula defining the class of frames over which modal logic is undecidable. Second, we consider the satisfiability problem of bimodal logic over Horn definable classes of frames, and also present a formula leading to undecidability.},
  author       = {Michaliszyn, Jakub and Otop, Jan and Kieroňski, Emanuel},
  journal      = {ACM Transactions on Computational Logic},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{On the decidability of elementary modal logics}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2817825},
  volume       = {17},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1689,
  abstract     = {We consider the problem of computing the set of initial states of a dynamical system such that there exists a control strategy to ensure that the trajectories satisfy a temporal logic specification with probability 1 (almost-surely). We focus on discrete-time, stochastic linear dynamics and specifications given as formulas of the Generalized Reactivity(1) fragment of Linear Temporal Logic over linear predicates in the states of the system. We propose a solution based on iterative abstraction-refinement, and turn-based 2-player probabilistic games. While the theoretical guarantee of our algorithm after any finite number of iterations is only a partial solution, we show that if our algorithm terminates, then the result is the set of satisfying initial states. Moreover, for any (partial) solution our algorithm synthesizes witness control strategies to ensure almost-sure satisfaction of the temporal logic specification. We demonstrate our approach on an illustrative case study.},
  author       = {Svoreňová, Mária and Kretinsky, Jan and Chmelik, Martin and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Cěrná, Ivana and Belta, Cǎlin},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {259 -- 268},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Temporal logic control for stochastic linear systems using abstraction refinement of probabilistic games}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728608},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1690,
  abstract     = {A number of powerful and scalable hybrid systems model checkers have recently emerged. Although all of them honor roughly the same hybrid systems semantics, they have drastically different model description languages. This situation (a) makes it difficult to quickly evaluate a specific hybrid automaton model using the different tools, (b) obstructs comparisons of reachability approaches, and (c) impedes the widespread application of research results that perform model modification and could benefit many of the tools. In this paper, we present Hyst, a Hybrid Source Transformer. Hyst is a source-to-source translation tool, currently taking input in the SpaceEx model format, and translating to the formats of HyCreate, Flow∗, or dReach. Internally, the tool supports generic model-to-model transformation passes that serve to both ease the translation and potentially improve reachability results for the supported tools. Although these model transformation passes could be implemented within each tool, the Hyst approach provides a single place for model modification, generating modified input sources for the unmodified target tools. Our evaluation demonstrates Hyst is capable of automatically translating benchmarks in several classes (including affine and nonlinear hybrid automata) to the input formats of several tools. Additionally, we illustrate a general model transformation pass based on pseudo-invariants implemented in Hyst that illustrates the reachability improvement.},
  author       = {Bak, Stanley and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Johnson, Taylor},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {128 -- 133},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{HYST: A source transformation and translation tool for hybrid automaton models}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728630},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1692,
  abstract     = {Computing an approximation of the reachable states of a hybrid system is a challenge, mainly because overapproximating the solutions of ODEs with a finite number of sets does not scale well. Using template polyhedra can greatly reduce the computational complexity, since it replaces complex operations on sets with a small number of optimization problems. However, the use of templates may make the over-approximation too conservative. Spurious transitions, which are falsely considered reachable, are particularly detrimental to performance and accuracy, and may exacerbate the state explosion problem. In this paper, we examine how spurious transitions can be avoided with minimal computational effort. To this end, detecting spurious transitions is reduced to the well-known problem of showing that two convex sets are disjoint by finding a hyperplane that separates them. We generalize this to owpipes by considering hyperplanes that evolve with time in correspondence to the dynamics of the system. The approach is implemented in the model checker SpaceEx and demonstrated on examples.},
  author       = {Frehse, Goran and Bogomolov, Sergiy and Greitschus, Marius and Strump, Thomas and Podelski, Andreas},
  booktitle    = {Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control},
  isbn         = {978-1-4503-3433-4},
  location     = {Seattle, WA, United States},
  pages        = {149 -- 158},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Eliminating spurious transitions in reachability with support functions}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2728606.2728622},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1698,
  abstract     = {In mean-payoff games, the objective of the protagonist is to ensure that the limit average of an infinite sequence of numeric weights is nonnegative. In energy games, the objective is to ensure that the running sum of weights is always nonnegative. Multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games replace individual weights by tuples, and the limit average (resp., running sum) of each coordinate must be (resp., remain) nonnegative. We prove finite-memory determinacy of multi-energy games and show inter-reducibility of multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games for finite-memory strategies. We improve the computational complexity for solving both classes with finite-memory strategies: we prove coNP-completeness improving the previous known EXPSPACE bound. For memoryless strategies, we show that deciding the existence of a winning strategy for the protagonist is NP-complete. We present the first solution of multi-mean-payoff games with infinite-memory strategies: we show that mean-payoff-sup objectives can be decided in NP∩coNP, whereas mean-payoff-inf objectives are coNP-complete.},
  author       = {Velner, Yaron and Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Doyen, Laurent and Henzinger, Thomas A and Rabinovich, Alexander and Raskin, Jean},
  journal      = {Information and Computation},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {177 -- 196},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  title        = {{The complexity of multi-mean-payoff and multi-energy games}},
  doi          = {10.1016/j.ic.2015.03.001},
  volume       = {241},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1846,
  abstract     = {Modal transition systems (MTS) is a well-studied specification formalism of reactive systems supporting a step-wise refinement methodology. Despite its many advantages, the formalism as well as its currently known extensions are incapable of expressing some practically needed aspects in the refinement process like exclusive, conditional and persistent choices. We introduce a new model called parametric modal transition systems (PMTS) together with a general modal refinement notion that overcomes many of the limitations. We investigate the computational complexity of modal and thorough refinement checking on PMTS and its subclasses and provide a direct encoding of the modal refinement problem into quantified Boolean formulae, allowing us to employ state-of-the-art QBF solvers for modal refinement checking. The experiments we report on show that the feasibility of refinement checking is more influenced by the degree of nondeterminism rather than by the syntactic restrictions on the types of formulae allowed in the description of the PMTS.},
  author       = {Beneš, Nikola and Kretinsky, Jan and Larsen, Kim and Möller, Mikael and Sickert, Salomon and Srba, Jiří},
  journal      = {Acta Informatica},
  number       = {2-3},
  pages        = {269 -- 297},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Refinement checking on parametric modal transition systems}},
  doi          = {10.1007/s00236-015-0215-4},
  volume       = {52},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1856,
  abstract     = {The traditional synthesis question given a specification asks for the automatic construction of a system that satisfies the specification, whereas often there exists a preference order among the different systems that satisfy the given specification. Under a probabilistic assumption about the possible inputs, such a preference order is naturally expressed by a weighted automaton, which assigns to each word a value, such that a system is preferred if it generates a higher expected value. We solve the following optimal synthesis problem: given an omega-regular specification, a Markov chain that describes the distribution of inputs, and a weighted automaton that measures how well a system satisfies the given specification under the input assumption, synthesize a system that optimizes the measured value. For safety specifications and quantitative measures that are defined by mean-payoff automata, the optimal synthesis problem reduces to finding a strategy in a Markov decision process (MDP) that is optimal for a long-run average reward objective, which can be achieved in polynomial time. For general omega-regular specifications along with mean-payoff automata, the solution rests on a new, polynomial-time algorithm for computing optimal strategies in MDPs with mean-payoff parity objectives. Our algorithm constructs optimal strategies that consist of two memoryless strategies and a counter. The counter is in general not bounded. To obtain a finite-state system, we show how to construct an ε-optimal strategy with a bounded counter, for all ε &gt; 0. Furthermore, we show how to decide in polynomial time if it is possible to construct an optimal finite-state system (i.e., a system without a counter) for a given specification. We have implemented our approach and the underlying algorithms in a tool that takes qualitative and quantitative specifications and automatically constructs a system that satisfies the qualitative specification and optimizes the quantitative specification, if such a system exists. We present some experimental results showing optimal systems that were automatically generated in this way.},
  author       = {Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Henzinger, Thomas A and Jobstmann, Barbara and Singh, Rohit},
  journal      = {Journal of the ACM},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Measuring and synthesizing systems in probabilistic environments}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2699430},
  volume       = {62},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1861,
  abstract     = {Continuous-time Markov chains are commonly used in practice for modeling biochemical reaction networks in which the inherent randomness of themolecular interactions cannot be ignored. This has motivated recent research effort into methods for parameter inference and experiment design for such models. The major difficulty is that such methods usually require one to iteratively solve the chemical master equation that governs the time evolution of the probability distribution of the system. This, however, is rarely possible, and even approximation techniques remain limited to relatively small and simple systems. An alternative explored in this article is to base methods on only some low-order moments of the entire probability distribution. We summarize the theory behind such moment-based methods for parameter inference and experiment design and provide new case studies where we investigate their performance.},
  author       = {Ruess, Jakob and Lygeros, John},
  journal      = {ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation},
  number       = {2},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{Moment-based methods for parameter inference and experiment design for stochastic biochemical reaction networks}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2688906},
  volume       = {25},
  year         = {2015},
}

@article{1866,
  author       = {Henzinger, Thomas A and Raskin, Jean},
  journal      = {Communications of the ACM},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {86--86},
  publisher    = {ACM},
  title        = {{The equivalence problem for finite automata: Technical perspective}},
  doi          = {10.1145/2701001},
  volume       = {58},
  year         = {2015},
}

@inproceedings{1882,
  abstract     = {We provide a framework for compositional and iterative design and verification of systems with quantitative information, such as rewards, time or energy. It is based on disjunctive modal transition systems where we allow actions to bear various types of quantitative information. Throughout the design process the actions can be further refined and the information made more precise. We show how to compute the results of standard operations on the systems, including the quotient (residual), which has not been previously considered for quantitative non-deterministic systems. Our quantitative framework has close connections to the modal nu-calculus and is compositional with respect to general notions of distances between systems and the standard operations.},
  author       = {Fahrenberg, Uli and Kretinsky, Jan and Legay, Axel and Traonouez, Louis},
  location     = {Bertinoro, Italy},
  pages        = {306 -- 324},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  title        = {{Compositionality for quantitative specifications}},
  doi          = {10.1007/978-3-319-15317-9_19},
  volume       = {8997},
  year         = {2015},
}

@misc{5439,
  abstract     = {The target discounted-sum problem is the following: Given a rational discount factor 0 < λ < 1 and three rational values a, b, and t, does there exist a finite or an infinite sequence w ε(a, b)∗ or w ε(a, b)w, such that Σ|w| i=0 w(i)λi equals t? The problem turns out to relate to many fields of mathematics and computer science, and its decidability question is surprisingly hard to solve. We solve the finite version of the problem, and show the hardness of the infinite version, linking it to various areas and open problems in mathematics and computer science: β-expansions, discounted-sum automata, piecewise affine maps, and generalizations of the Cantor set. We provide some partial results to the infinite version, among which are solutions to its restriction to eventually-periodic sequences and to the cases that λ λ 1/2 or λ = 1/n, for every n ε N. We use our results for solving some open problems on discounted-sum automata, among which are the exact-value problem for nondeterministic automata over finite words and the universality and inclusion problems for functional automata. },
  author       = {Boker, Udi and Henzinger, Thomas A and Otop, Jan},
  issn         = {2664-1690},
  pages        = {20},
  publisher    = {IST Austria},
  title        = {{The target discounted-sum problem}},
  doi          = {10.15479/AT:IST-2015-335-v1-1},
  year         = {2015},
}

