@techreport{20146,
  abstract     = {This criteria catalogue and the accompanying assessment questions were developed by a working group of KEMÖ (Kooperation E-Medien Österreich, the Austrian Academic Library Consortium). They are intended to support research institutions and organisations in the evaluation of Open Science Infrastructures. The 20 criteria outlined in the catalogue provide a structured basis for making informed decisions regarding the financial support of these infrastructures.

The assessment questions are intended to be completed by Open Science Infrastructures and can be shared with them accordingly.},
  author       = {Gredler, Paul and Kaier, Christian and Danowski, Patrick and Zoyer, Michael and Rieck, Katharina and Ferus, Andreas and Rosenberger, Elisabeth and Löffler, Alexander and Hofer, Lisa and Still, Laura},
  publisher    = {Zenodo},
  title        = {{Catalogue of criteria for assessing the funding eligibility of Open Science infrastructures}},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.15269364},
  year         = {2025},
}

@techreport{8695,
  abstract     = {A look at international activities on Open Science reveals a broad spectrum from individual institutional policies to national action plans. The present Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria are based on these international initiatives and present practical considerations for their coordinated implementation with regard to strategic developments in research, technology and innovation (RTI) in Austria until 2030. They are addressed to all relevant actors in the RTI system, in particular to Research Performing Organisations, Research Funding Organisations, Research Policy, memory institutions such as Libraries and Researchers. The recommendation paper was developed from 2018 to 2020 by the OANA working group "Open Science Strategy" and published for the first time in spring 2020 for a public consultation. The now available final version of the recommendation document, which contains feedback and comments from the consultation, is intended to provide an impetus for further discussion and implementation of Open Science in Austria and serves as a contribution and basis for a potential national Open Science Strategy in Austria. The document builds on the diverse expertise of the authors (academia, administration, library and archive, information technology, science policy, funding system, etc.) and reflects their personal experiences and opinions.},
  author       = {Mayer, Katja and Rieck, Katharina and Reichmann, Stefan and Danowski, Patrick and Graschopf, Anton and König, Thomas and Kraker, Peter and Lehner, Patrick and Reckling, Falk and Ross-Hellauer, Tony and Spichtinger, Daniel and Tzatzanis, Michalis and Schürz, Stefanie},
  pages        = {36},
  publisher    = {OANA},
  title        = {{Empfehlungen für eine nationale Open Science Strategie in Österreich / Recommendations for a National Open Science Strategy in Austria}},
  doi          = {10.5281/ZENODO.4109242},
  year         = {2020},
}

@article{8706,
  abstract     = {As part of the Austrian Transition to Open Access (AT2OA) project, subproject TP1-B is working on designing a monitoring solution for the output of Open Access publications in Austria. This report on a potential Open Access monitoring approach in Austria is one of the results of these efforts and can serve as a basis for discussion on an international level.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Ferus, Andreas and Hikl, Anna-Laetitia and McNeill, Gerda and Miniberger, Clemens and Reding, Steve and Zarka, Tobias and Zojer, Michael},
  issn         = {1022-2588},
  journal      = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {278--284},
  publisher    = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  title        = {{„Recommendation“ for the further procedure for open access monitoring. Deliverable of the AT2OA subproject TP1-B}},
  doi          = {10.31263/voebm.v73i2.3941},
  volume       = {73},
  year         = {2020},
}

@article{6657,
  abstract     = {In this article a model is described how Open Access definitions can be formed on the basis of objective criteria. The common Open Access definitions such as "gold" and "green" are not exactly defined. This becomes a problem as soon as one begins to measure Open Access, for example if the development of the Open Access share should be monitored. This was discussed in the working group on Open Access Monitoring  of  the  AT2OA  project  and  the  present  model  was  developed, which is based on 5 critics with 4 characteristics: location, licence, version, embargo and conditions of the Open Access publication are taken into account. In the meantime, the model has also been tested in practice using R scripts, and the initial results are quite promising.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  issn         = {1022-2588},
  journal      = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {59--65},
  publisher    = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  title        = {{An Austrian proposal for the classification of Open Access Tuples (COAT) - distinguish different open access types beyond colors}},
  doi          = {10.31263/voebm.v72i1.2276},
  volume       = {72},
  year         = {2019},
}

@techreport{5686,
  abstract     = {In the working paper I describe in detail the approach for Open Access definitions which was presented in the Workshop "Open Access Monitoring - Approaches and Perspectives" in Vienna. It defines five criteria on which are the definitions build. Each criteria can be out of 4 classes. The minimum classes for the criteria which are used in a Open Access definition can be presented as the Classification of Open Access Tuples e.g. Open Access (Berlin Declaration) (1,1,1,1,3) this methods allows much easier to distinguish between different Open Access definitions. This is needed if the Open Access Universe should be measured in studies or monitoring approaches and the results should become more comparable.     },
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  pages        = {5},
  publisher    = {Zenodo},
  title        = {{An Austrian proposal for the Classification of Open Access Tuples (COAT) - Distinguish different Open Access types beyond colors}},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.1244154},
  year         = {2018},
}

@article{1525,
  abstract     = {Based on 16 recommendations, efforts should be made to achieve the following goal: By 2025, all scholarly publication activity in Austria should be Open Access. In other words, the final versions of all scholarly publications resulting from the support of public resources must be freely accessible on the Internet without delay (Gold Open Access). The resources required to meet this obligation shall be provided to the authors, or the cost of the publication venues shall be borne directly by the research organisations.},
  author       = {Bauer, Bruno and Blechl, Guido and Bock, Christoph and Danowski, Patrick and Ferus, Andreas and Graschopf, Anton and König, Thomas and Mayer, Katja and Reckling, Falk and Rieck, Katharina and Seitz, Peter and Stöger, Herwig and Welzig, Elvira},
  journal      = {VÖB Mitteilungen},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {580 -- 607},
  publisher    = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  title        = {{Arbeitsgruppe „Nationale Strategie“ des Open Access Network Austria OANA}},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.33178},
  volume       = {68},
  year         = {2015},
}

@book{2306,
  abstract     = {Das Buch ist sowohl eine Einführung in die Themen Linked Data, Open Data und Open Linked Data als es auch den konkreten Bezug auf Bibliotheken behandelt. Hierzu werden konkrete Anwendungsprojekte beschrieben. Der Band wendet sich dabei sowohl an Personen aus der Bibliothekspraxis als auch an Personen aus dem Bibliotheksmanagement, die noch nicht mit dem Thema vertraut sind.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Pohl, Adrian},
  isbn         = { 978-3-11-027634-3},
  issn         = {2191-3587},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{(Open) Linked Data in Bibliotheken}},
  doi          = {10.1515/9783110278736},
  volume       = {50},
  year         = {2013},
}

@article{2256,
  abstract     = {Linked (Open) Data - bibliographic data on the Semantic Web. Report of the Working Group on Linked Data to the plenary assembly of the Austrian Library Network (translation of the title). Linked Data stands for a certain approach to publishing data on the Web. The underlying idea is to harmonise heterogeneous data sources of different origin in order to improve their accessibility and interoperability, effectively making them queryable as a big distributed database. This report summarises relevant developments in Europe as well as the Linked Data Working Group‘s strategic and technical considerations regarding the publishing of the Austrian Library Network’s (OBV’s) bibliographic datasets. It concludes with the mutual agreement that the implementation of Linked Data principles within the OBV can only be taken into consideration accompanied by a discussion about the provision of the datasets under a free license.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Goldfarb, Doron and Schaffner, Verena and Seidler, Wolfram},
  journal      = {VÖB Mitteilungen},
  number       = {3/4},
  pages        = {559 -- 587},
  publisher    = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  title        = {{Linked (Open) Data - Bibliographische Daten im Semantic Web}},
  volume       = {66},
  year         = {2013},
}

@article{3244,
  abstract     = {Bibliothekare haben die Aufgabe, sich mit neuen Medienformen auseinanderzusetzen.
},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  issn         = {1869-1137},
  journal      = {BuB - Forum Bibliothek und Information},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {284},
  publisher    = {Fachzeitschrift des BIB – Berufsverband Information Bibliothek},
  title        = {{Die Zeit des Abwartens ist vorbei!}},
  volume       = {64},
  year         = {2012},
}

@article{3243,
  abstract     = {Wie wandelt sich das Berufsbild in Wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken? Patrick Danowski gibt seine Einschätzung ab. },
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  issn         = {1607-7172},
  journal      = {Büchereiperspektiven},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {11},
  publisher    = {Büchereiverband Österreichs},
  title        = {{Zwischen Technologie und Kommunikation}},
  volume       = {2012},
  year         = {2012},
}

@article{2965,
  abstract     = {Dieser Artikel soll die sechs verschiedenen Creative Commons Lizenzen erläutern und ihre Bedeutung im Rahmen des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens und des Open Access erklären (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-BY-NC, CC-BY-ND, CC-BYNC-SA, CC-BY-NC-ND).},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  journal      = {Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {200 -- 212},
  publisher    = {Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare},
  title        = {{Kontext Open Access: Creative Commons}},
  volume       = {65},
  year         = {2012},
}

@book{4346,
  abstract     = {With the term "Library 2.0" the editors mean an institution which applies the principles of the Web 2.0 such as openness, re-use, collaboration and interaction in the entire organization. Libraries are extending their service offerings and work processes to include the potential of Web 2.0 technologies. This changes the job description and self-image of librarians. The collective volume offers a complete overview of the topic Library 2.0 and the current state of developments from a technological, sociological, information theoretical and practice-oriented perspective.},
  editor       = {Danowski, Patrick and Bergmann, Julia},
  isbn         = {9-783-1102-3209-7},
  pages        = {405},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{Handbuch Bibliothek 2.0}},
  doi          = {10.1515/9783110232103},
  volume       = { 41},
  year         = {2010},
}

@inbook{4339,
  abstract     = {Mit diesem Buch möchten wir einen Überblick der aktuellen Diskussion zum Thema Bibliothek 2.0 geben und den Stand der tatsächlichen Umsetzung der Web 2.0-Ansätze in deutschsprachigen Bibliotheken beleuchten. An dieser Stelle ist die Frage erlaubt, warum es zu einer Zeit, in der es bereits die ersten "Web 3.0"- Konferenzen gibt, eines Handbuches der Bibliothek 2.0 noch bedarf. Und warum es überhaupt ein deutschsprachiges Handbuch zur Bibliothek 2.0 braucht, wo es doch bereits verschiedenste Publikationen zu diesem Thema aus anderen Ländern, insbesondere des angloamerikanischen Raums gibt. Ist dazu nicht bereits alles gesagt?},
  author       = {Bergmann, Julia and Danowski, Patrick},
  booktitle    = {Handbuch Bibliothek 2.0},
  editor       = {Bergmann, Julia and Danowski, Patrick},
  pages        = {5 -- 20},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{Ist Bibliothek 2.0 überhaupt noch relevant? – Eine Einleitung in das Handbuch}},
  doi          = {10.1515/9783110232103},
  year         = {2010},
}

@misc{4340,
  abstract     = {More and more libraries starting semantic web projects. The question about the license of the data
is not discussed or the discussion is deferred to the end of project. in this paper is discussed why
the question of the license is so important in context of the semantic web that is should be one of the
first aspects in a semantic web project. Also it will be shown why a public domain weaver is the
only solution that fulfill the the special requirements of the semantic web and that guaranties the
reuseablitly of semantic library data for a sustainability of the projects. },
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  booktitle    = {European Library Automation Group (ELAG) 2010},
  publisher    = {Elsevier},
  title        = {{Open bibliographic data}},
  year         = {2010},
}

@inproceedings{4341,
  abstract     = {More and more libraries starting semantic web projects. The question about the license of the data is not discussed or the discussion is deferred to the end of project. in this paper is discussed why the question of the license is so important in context of the semantic web that is should be one of the first aspects in a semantic web project. Also it will be shown why a public domain weaver is the only solution that fulfill the the special requirements of the semantic web and that guaranties the reuseablitly of semantic library data for a sustainability of the projects.},
  author       = {Patrick Danowski},
  publisher    = {IFLA},
  title        = {{Step one: blow up the silo! - Open bibliographic data, the first step towards Linked Open Data}},
  year         = {2010},
}

@article{4344,
  abstract     = {Anknüpfend an ihren Aufsatz „Bibliothek 2.0 – Die Zukunft der Bibliothek?“ (2006) geben Patrick Danowski und Lambert Heller, verantwortlich für das Schwerpunktthema der vorliegenden Ausgabe, einen Überblick über den erreichten Diskussionsstand über verschiedene Teilaspekte der Bibliothek 2.0 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Fachöffentlichkeit. Einige charakteristische Fragen und Probleme der Weiterentwicklung, Öffnung und Vernetzung bibliothekarischer Dienste und Informationen werden angesprochen.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Heller, Lambert},
  journal      = {Bibliothek - Forschung und Praxis},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {130 -- 136},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{Bibliothek 2.0? Wird alles anders?}},
  doi          = {10.1515/BFUP.2007.130},
  volume       = {31},
  year         = {2007},
}

@inproceedings{4342,
  abstract     = {Library 2.0 and user-generated content are two terms, which are closely connected. In the

presentation, I will briefly define both terms. Two example projects where user- generated content and libraries interact will be presented. The cooperation of Wikipedia and the Personennamendatei, the German cooperative name authority files is the first. The second will be Wikisource where users provide transcribed source material. Another important area of user-generated content is social tagging where users index different resources. And if the users will do so much in the future, is there still a place for librarians? But in the future user

and librarians become partners and the library will provide the platform: the library 2.0.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick},
  location     = {Durban, South Africa},
  publisher    = {IFLA},
  title        = {{Library 2.0 and User-Generated Content - What can the users do for us?}},
  doi          = {601},
  year         = {2007},
}

@article{4343,
  abstract     = {Wikipedia and libraries share the same goal: simple and fast knowledge transfer. Through linking different information resources on the Internet, knowledge gets comprehensively accessible. The co-operation with the Personennamendatei, the German authority file for names of persons is an example for linking between Wikipedia and library catalogs. The article highlights, how this co-operation works and what the benefits are.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Pfeifer, Barbara},
  journal      = {Bibliothek - Forschung und Praxis},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {149 -- 155},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{Wikipedia und Normdateien: Wege der Vernetzung am Beispiel der Kooperation mit der Personennamendatei}},
  doi          = {10.1515/BFUP.2007.149},
  volume       = {31},
  year         = {2007},
}

@article{4345,
  abstract     = {Der Artikel beschäftigt sich mit dem Konzept der Bibliothek 2.0 (bzw. Library 2.0). Er skizziert anhand einiger Beispiele die Entwicklung zum Web 2.0 und beschreibt, wie Web 2.0-Technologien und -Anwendungen in Bibliotheken eingesetzt werden. Im Mittelpunkt stehen Social-Tagging-Systeme, benutzerorientierte Erweiterungen von Bibliothekskatalogen und Dokumentenservern sowie der Einsatz von Weblogs an Bibliotheken. Ferner werden neue Anforderungen an Bibliothekare diskutiert.},
  author       = {Danowski, Patrick and Heller, Lambert},
  journal      = {Bibliotheksdienst},
  number       = {11},
  pages        = {1250 -- 1271},
  publisher    = {De Gruyter},
  title        = {{Bibliothek 2.0 - Die Bibliothek der Zukunft?}},
  doi          = {10.1515/bd.2006.40.11.1259},
  volume       = {40},
  year         = {2006},
}