{"publication_status":"published","external_id":{"arxiv":["1702.05172"],"isi":["000444141200005"]},"year":"2018","publisher":"Springer","volume":40,"day":"01","oa":1,"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"main_file_link":[{"url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05172","open_access":"1"}],"date_updated":"2023-09-13T08:49:16Z","_id":"106","publication":"Mathematical Intelligencer","publist_id":"7948","issue":"3","doi":"10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5","page":"26 - 31","title":"Long geodesics on convex surfaces","status":"public","month":"09","type":"journal_article","article_processing_charge":"No","user_id":"c635000d-4b10-11ee-a964-aac5a93f6ac1","oa_version":"Preprint","date_created":"2018-12-11T11:44:40Z","date_published":"2018-09-01T00:00:00Z","quality_controlled":"1","scopus_import":"1","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"The goal of this article is to introduce the reader to the theory of intrinsic geometry of convex surfaces. We illustrate the power of the tools by proving a theorem on convex surfaces containing an arbitrarily long closed simple geodesic. Let us remind ourselves that a curve in a surface is called geodesic if every sufficiently short arc of the curve is length minimizing; if, in addition, it has no self-intersections, we call it simple geodesic. A tetrahedron with equal opposite edges is called isosceles. The axiomatic method of Alexandrov geometry allows us to work with the metrics of convex surfaces directly, without approximating it first by a smooth or polyhedral metric. Such approximations destroy the closed geodesics on the surface; therefore it is difficult (if at all possible) to apply approximations in the proof of our theorem. On the other hand, a proof in the smooth or polyhedral case usually admits a translation into Alexandrov’s language; such translation makes the result more general. In fact, our proof resembles a translation of the proof given by Protasov. Note that the main theorem implies in particular that a smooth convex surface does not have arbitrarily long simple closed geodesics. However we do not know a proof of this corollary that is essentially simpler than the one presented below."}],"author":[{"first_name":"Arseniy","id":"430D2C90-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","orcid":"0000-0002-2548-617X","full_name":"Akopyan, Arseniy","last_name":"Akopyan"},{"last_name":"Petrunin","full_name":"Petrunin, Anton","first_name":"Anton"}],"intvolume":"        40","citation":{"chicago":"Akopyan, Arseniy, and Anton Petrunin. “Long Geodesics on Convex Surfaces.” <i>Mathematical Intelligencer</i>. Springer, 2018. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5</a>.","mla":"Akopyan, Arseniy, and Anton Petrunin. “Long Geodesics on Convex Surfaces.” <i>Mathematical Intelligencer</i>, vol. 40, no. 3, Springer, 2018, pp. 26–31, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5\">10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5</a>.","apa":"Akopyan, A., &#38; Petrunin, A. (2018). Long geodesics on convex surfaces. <i>Mathematical Intelligencer</i>. Springer. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5</a>","ieee":"A. Akopyan and A. Petrunin, “Long geodesics on convex surfaces,” <i>Mathematical Intelligencer</i>, vol. 40, no. 3. Springer, pp. 26–31, 2018.","ista":"Akopyan A, Petrunin A. 2018. Long geodesics on convex surfaces. Mathematical Intelligencer. 40(3), 26–31.","ama":"Akopyan A, Petrunin A. Long geodesics on convex surfaces. <i>Mathematical Intelligencer</i>. 2018;40(3):26-31. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5\">10.1007/s00283-018-9795-5</a>","short":"A. Akopyan, A. Petrunin, Mathematical Intelligencer 40 (2018) 26–31."},"isi":1,"department":[{"_id":"HeEd"}]}