{"publication_identifier":{"eissn":["1522-9602"],"issn":["0092-8240"]},"year":"2022","ec_funded":1,"month":"06","citation":{"short":"R.J. Saona Urmeneta, F. Kondrashov, K. Khudiakova, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 84 (2022).","mla":"Saona Urmeneta, Raimundo J., et al. “Relation between the Number of Peaks and the Number of Reciprocal Sign Epistatic Interactions.” <i>Bulletin of Mathematical Biology</i>, vol. 84, no. 8, 74, Springer Nature, 2022, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z\">10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z</a>.","ieee":"R. J. Saona Urmeneta, F. Kondrashov, and K. Khudiakova, “Relation between the number of peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions,” <i>Bulletin of Mathematical Biology</i>, vol. 84, no. 8. Springer Nature, 2022.","ama":"Saona Urmeneta RJ, Kondrashov F, Khudiakova K. Relation between the number of peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions. <i>Bulletin of Mathematical Biology</i>. 2022;84(8). doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z\">10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z</a>","chicago":"Saona Urmeneta, Raimundo J, Fyodor Kondrashov, and Kseniia Khudiakova. “Relation between the Number of Peaks and the Number of Reciprocal Sign Epistatic Interactions.” <i>Bulletin of Mathematical Biology</i>. Springer Nature, 2022. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z</a>.","ista":"Saona Urmeneta RJ, Kondrashov F, Khudiakova K. 2022. Relation between the number of peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 84(8), 74.","apa":"Saona Urmeneta, R. J., Kondrashov, F., &#38; Khudiakova, K. (2022). Relation between the number of peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions. <i>Bulletin of Mathematical Biology</i>. Springer Nature. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z\">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z</a>"},"date_published":"2022-06-17T00:00:00Z","intvolume":"        84","tmp":{"name":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0)","image":"/images/cc_by.png","short":"CC BY (4.0)","legal_code_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"},"project":[{"call_identifier":"H2020","name":"Characterizing the fitness landscape on population and global scales","_id":"26580278-B435-11E9-9278-68D0E5697425","grant_number":"771209"},{"name":"Evolutionary analysis of gene regulation","_id":"c098eddd-5a5b-11eb-8a69-abe27170a68f","grant_number":"I05127"}],"quality_controlled":"1","related_material":{"link":[{"relation":"erratum","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01118-z"}]},"keyword":["Computational Theory and Mathematics","General Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Pharmacology","General Environmental Science","General Biochemistry","Genetics and Molecular Biology","General Mathematics","Immunology","General Neuroscience"],"title":"Relation between the number of peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions","ddc":["510","570"],"article_number":"74","acknowledgement":"We are grateful to Herbert Edelsbrunner and Jeferson Zapata for helpful discussions. Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF). Partially supported by the ERC Consolidator (771209–CharFL) and the FWF Austrian Science Fund (I5127-B) grants to FAK.","issue":"8","has_accepted_license":"1","type":"journal_article","doi":"10.1007/s11538-022-01029-z","article_type":"original","date_updated":"2023-08-03T07:20:53Z","oa_version":"Published Version","author":[{"orcid":"0000-0001-5103-038X","first_name":"Raimundo J","last_name":"Saona Urmeneta","full_name":"Saona Urmeneta, Raimundo J","id":"BD1DF4C4-D767-11E9-B658-BC13E6697425"},{"orcid":"0000-0001-8243-4694","first_name":"Fyodor","last_name":"Kondrashov","full_name":"Kondrashov, Fyodor","id":"44FDEF62-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87"},{"id":"4E6DC800-AE37-11E9-AC72-31CAE5697425","full_name":"Khudiakova, Kseniia","last_name":"Khudiakova","orcid":"0000-0002-6246-1465","first_name":"Kseniia"}],"external_id":{"isi":["000812509800001"]},"status":"public","department":[{"_id":"GradSch"},{"_id":"NiBa"},{"_id":"JaMa"}],"day":"17","publisher":"Springer Nature","article_processing_charge":"Yes (via OA deal)","user_id":"4359f0d1-fa6c-11eb-b949-802e58b17ae8","isi":1,"file":[{"date_updated":"2022-06-20T07:51:32Z","success":1,"content_type":"application/pdf","creator":"dernst","file_id":"11455","file_name":"2022_BulletinMathBiology_Saona.pdf","checksum":"05a1fe7d10914a00c2bca9b447993a65","access_level":"open_access","date_created":"2022-06-20T07:51:32Z","file_size":463025,"relation":"main_file"}],"publication":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication_status":"published","oa":1,"_id":"11447","scopus_import":"1","file_date_updated":"2022-06-20T07:51:32Z","volume":84,"abstract":[{"text":"Empirical essays of fitness landscapes suggest that they may be rugged, that is having multiple fitness peaks. Such fitness landscapes, those that have multiple peaks, necessarily have special local structures, called reciprocal sign epistasis (Poelwijk et al. in J Theor Biol 272:141–144, 2011). Here, we investigate the quantitative relationship between the number of fitness peaks and the number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions. Previously, it has been shown (Poelwijk et al. in J Theor Biol 272:141–144, 2011) that pairwise reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the existence of multiple peaks. Applying discrete Morse theory, which to our knowledge has never been used in this context, we extend this result by giving the minimal number of reciprocal sign epistatic interactions required to create a given number of peaks.","lang":"eng"}],"date_created":"2022-06-17T16:16:15Z"}