<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>A deamortization approach for dynamic spanner and dynamic maximal matching</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Bernstein, Aaron</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Forster, Sebastian</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Henzinger, Monika H ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-6530</dc:creator>
   	<dc:description>Many dynamic graph algorithms have an amortized update time, rather than a stronger worst-case guarantee. But amortized data structures are not suitable for real-time systems, where each individual operation has to be executed quickly. For this reason, there exist many recent randomized results that aim to provide a guarantee stronger than amortized expected. The strongest possible guarantee for a randomized algorithm is that it is always correct (Las Vegas) and has high-probability worst-case update time, which gives a bound on the time for each individual operation that holds with high probability.

In this article, we present the first polylogarithmic high-probability worst-case time bounds for the dynamic spanner and the dynamic maximal matching problem.

(1)

For dynamic spanner, the only known o(n) worst-case bounds were O(n3/4) high-probability worst-case update time for maintaining a 3-spanner and O(n5/9) for maintaining a 5-spanner. We give a O(1)k log3 (n) high-probability worst-case time bound for maintaining a (2k-1)-spanner, which yields the first worst-case polylog update time for all constant k. (All the results above maintain the optimal tradeoff of stretch 2k-1 and Õ(n1+1/k) edges.)

(2)

For dynamic maximal matching, or dynamic 2-approximate maximum matching, no algorithm with o(n) worst-case time bound was known and we present an algorithm with O(log 5 (n)) high-probability worst-case time; similar worst-case bounds existed only for maintaining a matching that was (2+ϵ)-approximate, and hence not maximal.

Our results are achieved using a new approach for converting amortized guarantees to worst-case ones for randomized data structures by going through a third type of guarantee, which is a middle ground between the two above: An algorithm is said to have worst-case expected update time ɑ if for every update σ, the expected time to process σ is at most ɑ. Although stronger than amortized expected, the worst-case expected guarantee does not resolve the fundamental problem of amortization: A worst-case expected update time of O(1) still allows for the possibility that every 1/f(n) updates requires ϴ (f(n)) time to process, for arbitrarily high f(n). In this article, we present a black-box reduction that converts any data structure with worst-case expected update time into one with a high-probability worst-case update time: The query time remains the same, while the update time increases by a factor of O(log 2(n)).

Thus, we achieve our results in two steps:

(1) First, we show how to convert existing dynamic graph algorithms with amortized expected polylogarithmic running times into algorithms with worst-case expected polylogarithmic running times.

(2) Then, we use our black-box reduction to achieve the polylogarithmic high-probability worst-case time bound. All our algorithms are Las-Vegas-type algorithms.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>Association for Computing Machinery</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2021</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/11663</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Bernstein A, Forster S, Henzinger M. A deamortization approach for dynamic spanner and dynamic maximal matching. &lt;i&gt;ACM Transactions on Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;. 2021;17(4). doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1145/3469833&quot;&gt;10.1145/3469833&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1145/3469833</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1549-6325</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/e-issn/1549-6333</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/1810.10932</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
