<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/11717">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/11717"/>
        <dc:title>Rigidity of Newton dynamics</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>We study rigidity of rational maps that come from Newton&apos;s root finding method for polynomials of arbitrary degrees. We establish dynamical rigidity of these maps: each point in the Julia set of a Newton map is either rigid (i.e. its orbit can be distinguished in combinatorial terms from all other orbits), or the orbit of this point eventually lands in the filled-in Julia set of a polynomial-like restriction of the original map. As a corollary, we show that the Julia sets of Newton maps in many non-trivial cases are locally connected; in particular, every cubic Newton map without Siegel points has locally connected Julia set.
In the parameter space of Newton maps of arbitrary degree we obtain the following rigidity result: any two combinatorially equivalent Newton maps are quasiconformally conjugate in a neighborhood of their Julia sets provided that they either non-renormalizable, or they are both renormalizable “in the same way”.
Our main tool is a generalized renormalization concept called “complex box mappings” for which we extend a dynamical rigidity result by Kozlovski and van Strien so as to include irrationally indifferent and renormalizable situations.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:volume>408</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:issue>Part A</bibo:issue>
        <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <ore:aggregates rdf:resource="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/download/11717/12474/2022_AdvancesMathematics_Drach.pdf"/>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.1016/j.aim.2022.108591" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.1016/j.aim.2022.108591"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
