<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in o(log3 n) worst case update time</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Bhattacharya, Sayan</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Henzinger, Monika H ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-6530</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Nanongkai, Danupon</dc:creator>
   	<dc:description>We consider the problem of maintaining an approximately maximum (fractional) matching and an approximately minimum vertex cover in a dynamic graph. Starting with the seminal paper by Onak and Rubinfeld [STOC 2010], this problem has received significant attention in recent years. There remains, however, a polynomial gap between the best known worst case update time and the best known amortised update time for this problem, even after allowing for randomisation. Specifically, Bernstein and Stein [ICALP 2015, SODA 2016] have the best known worst case update time. They present a deterministic data structure with approximation ratio (3/2 + ∊) and worst case update time O(m1/4/ ∊2), where m is the number of edges in the graph. In recent past, Gupta and Peng [FOCS 2013] gave a deterministic data structure with approximation ratio (1+ ∊) and worst case update time  No known randomised data structure beats the worst case update times of these two results. In contrast, the paper by Onak and Rubinfeld [STOC 2010] gave a randomised data structure with approximation ratio O(1) and amortised update time O(log2 n), where n is the number of nodes in the graph. This was later improved by Baswana, Gupta and Sen [FOCS 2011] and Solomon [FOCS 2016], leading to a randomised date structure with approximation ratio 2 and amortised update time O(1).

We bridge the polynomial gap between the worst case and amortised update times for this problem, without using any randomisation. We present a deterministic data structure with approximation ratio (2 + ∊) and worst case update time O(log3 n), for all sufficiently small constants ∊.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2017</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:conferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/11874</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Bhattacharya S, Henzinger M, Nanongkai D. Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in o(log3 n) worst case update time. In: &lt;i&gt;28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 0. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2017:470-489. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974782.30&quot;&gt;10.1137/1.9781611974782.30&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1137/1.9781611974782.30</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/e-isbn/978-161197478-2</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/1704.02844</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
