<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/12736">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/12736"/>
        <dc:title>Unexpected scaling in path copying trees</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>Although a wide variety of handcrafted concurrent data structures have been proposed, there is considerable interest in universal approaches (Universal Constructions or UCs) for building concurrent data structures. UCs (semi-)automatically convert a sequential data structure into a concurrent one. The simplest approach uses locks [3, 6] that protect a sequential data structure and allow only one process to access it at a time. However, the resulting data structure is blocking. Most work on UCs instead focuses on obtaining non-blocking progress guarantees such as obstruction-freedom, lock-freedom or wait-freedom. Many non-blocking UCs have appeared. Key examples include the seminal wait-free UC [2] by Herlihy, a NUMA-aware UC [10] by Yi et al., and an efficient UC for large objects [1] by Fatourou et al.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:startPage>438-440</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>438-440</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>Association for Computing Machinery</dc:publisher>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.1145/3572848.3577512" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.1145/3572848.3577512"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
