<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Compression of structured data with autoencoders: Provable benefit of nonlinearities and depth</dc:title>
   	<dc:title>PMLR</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Kögler, Kevin</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Shevchenko, Aleksandr</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Hassani, Hamed</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Mondelli, Marco ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3242-7020</dc:creator>
   	<dc:subject>ddc:000</dc:subject>
   	<dc:description>Autoencoders are a prominent model in many empirical branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, basic theoretical questions remain unanswered even in a shallow two-layer setting. In particular, to what degree does a shallow autoencoder capture the structure of the underlying data distribution? For the prototypical case of the 1-bit compression of sparse Gaussian data, we prove that gradient descent converges to a solution that completely disregards the sparse structure of the input. Namely, the performance of the algorithm is the same as if it was compressing a Gaussian source - with no sparsity. For general data distributions, we give evidence of a phase transition phenomenon in the shape of the gradient descent minimizer, as a function of the data sparsity: below the critical sparsity level, the minimizer is a rotation taken uniformly at random (just like in the compression of non-sparse data); above the critical sparsity, the minimizer is the identity (up to a permutation). Finally, by exploiting a connection with approximate message passing algorithms, we show how to improve upon Gaussian performance for the compression of sparse data: adding a denoising function to a shallow architecture already reduces the loss provably, and a suitable multi-layer decoder leads to a further improvement. We validate our findings on image datasets, such as CIFAR-10 and MNIST.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>ML Research Press</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2024</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:ConferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>ConferenceObject</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/17469</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Kögler K, Shevchenko A, Hassani H, Mondelli M. Compression of structured data with autoencoders: Provable benefit of nonlinearities and depth. In: &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 235. ML Research Press; 2024:24964-25015.</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/2402.05013</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
