@misc{20936,
  abstract     = {Supplementary material for Mombarg et al. (2025, A&A). Title: "Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of 
~Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields"

Content:
- Non-rotating ESTER models and associated .GSM models. (Xini = 0.71, Zini = 0.014, vertical/horizonal viscosity 10^7 cm^2/s, vertical chemical diffusion 10^4 cm^2/s for evolution model. More details on the ESTER models can be found in the ESTER manual.

- Rotational asymmetries computed with StORM and TOP in 1/d, and the central m=0 frequency from TOP in 1/d. (all_A*_new.pkl)

- Magnetic asymmetries in 1/d for different obliquity angles between 0 and 90 deg for ZAMS and MAMS model, for B_0 = 75 kG. *_nu key gives unperturbed mode frequencies, *_npg the radial order (asym_dict.pkl, asym_dict_evol.pkl)},
  author       = {Mombarg, Joey and Vanlaer, Vincent and Das, Srijan B and Rieutord, Michel and Aerts, Conny and Bugnet, Lisa Annabelle and Mathis, Stephane and Reese, Daniel and Ballot, Jerome},
  publisher    = {Zenodo},
  title        = {{Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators?}},
  doi          = {10.5281/ZENODO.17580178},
  year         = {2025},
}