Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Mombarg, Joey Vanlaer, Vincent Das, Srijan B ; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0896-7972 Rieutord, Michel Aerts, Conny Bugnet, Lisa Annabelle ; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-4000 Mathis, Stephane Reese, Daniel Ballot, Jerome ddc:520 Supplementary material for Mombarg et al. (2025, A&A). Title: "Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of ~Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields" Content: - Non-rotating ESTER models and associated .GSM models. (Xini = 0.71, Zini = 0.014, vertical/horizonal viscosity 10^7 cm^2/s, vertical chemical diffusion 10^4 cm^2/s for evolution model. More details on the ESTER models can be found in the ESTER manual. - Rotational asymmetries computed with StORM and TOP in 1/d, and the central m=0 frequency from TOP in 1/d. (all_A*_new.pkl) - Magnetic asymmetries in 1/d for different obliquity angles between 0 and 90 deg for ZAMS and MAMS model, for B_0 = 75 kG. *_nu key gives unperturbed mode frequencies, *_npg the radial order (asym_dict.pkl, asym_dict_evol.pkl) Zenodo 2025 info:eu-repo/semantics/other doc-type:other text http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1 https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/20936 Mombarg J, Vanlaer V, Das SB, et al. Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? 2025. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.17580178">10.5281/ZENODO.17580178</a> info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5281/ZENODO.17580178 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess