article published yes Allison Lin author Maria Charisi author Zoltán Haiman author 7c006e8c-cc0d-11ee-8322-cb904ef76f360000-0003-3633-5403 ZoHa department Supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB) systems are expected to form as a consequence of galaxy mergers. At subparsec separations, SMBHBs can be identified as quasars with periodic variability, with previous periodicity searches uncovering significant candidates. However, these searches focused primarily on sinusoidal signals, while theoretical models and hydrodynamical simulations predict that binaries produce more complex non-sinusoidal pulse shapes. Here we examine the efficacy of the Lomb–Scargle periodogram (LSP; one of the most popular tools for periodicity searches in unevenly sampled lightcurves) to detect periodicities with a sawtooth shape mimicking results of hydrodynamical simulations. We simulate idealized well-sampled lightcurves, lightcurves that mimic the data in the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) analyzed in M. Charisi et al. (2016), and lightcurves that resemble our expectations for single-band data in the upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) of the Rubin Observatory. We approximate quasar variability with a damped random walk (DRW) model, inject sinusoidal and sawtooth pulse shapes, and assess their statistical significance. We find that in the presence of red noise, the LSP detects a relatively low fraction of the sinusoidal signals (∼45%, ∼24%, and ∼23%, in the PTF-like, idealized, and LSST-like lightcurves, respectively). The fraction is significantly reduced for sawtooth periodicity (with only ∼9% in PTF-like and ∼1% in idealized and LSST-like lightcurves). These low recovery rates imply that previous searches have missed the large majority of binaries. They also have significant implications for the detection of SMBHBs in upcoming LSST necessitating the development of advanced tools that go beyond the simple LSP. https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/download/21712/21789/2026_AstrophysicalJour_Lin.pdf application/pdfno https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ IOP Publishing2026 eng 0004-637X 1538-435710.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7 9972 Lin, A., Charisi, M., &#38; Haiman, Z. (2026). Lomb-scargle periodogram struggles with non-sinusoidal supermassive Black Hole binary signatures in quasar lightcurves. <i>The Astrophysical Journal</i>. IOP Publishing. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7</a> Lin A, Charisi M, Haiman Z. Lomb-scargle periodogram struggles with non-sinusoidal supermassive Black Hole binary signatures in quasar lightcurves. <i>The Astrophysical Journal</i>. 2026;997(2). doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7">10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7</a> A. Lin, M. Charisi, and Z. Haiman, “Lomb-scargle periodogram struggles with non-sinusoidal supermassive Black Hole binary signatures in quasar lightcurves,” <i>The Astrophysical Journal</i>, vol. 997, no. 2. IOP Publishing, 2026. Lin, Allison, Maria Charisi, and Zoltán Haiman. “Lomb-Scargle Periodogram Struggles with Non-Sinusoidal Supermassive Black Hole Binary Signatures in Quasar Lightcurves.” <i>The Astrophysical Journal</i>. IOP Publishing, 2026. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7</a>. A. Lin, M. Charisi, Z. Haiman, The Astrophysical Journal 997 (2026). Lin, Allison, et al. “Lomb-Scargle Periodogram Struggles with Non-Sinusoidal Supermassive Black Hole Binary Signatures in Quasar Lightcurves.” <i>The Astrophysical Journal</i>, vol. 997, no. 2, 316, IOP Publishing, 2026, doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7">10.3847/1538-4357/ae29a7</a>. Lin A, Charisi M, Haiman Z. 2026. Lomb-scargle periodogram struggles with non-sinusoidal supermassive Black Hole binary signatures in quasar lightcurves. The Astrophysical Journal. 997(2), 316. 217122026-04-12T22:01:49Z2026-05-04T10:26:59Z