<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>article</genre>

<titleInfo><title>What role does natural selection play in speciation?</title></titleInfo>


<note type="publicationStatus">published</note>


<note type="qualityControlled">yes</note>

<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Nicholas H</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Barton</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">4880FE40-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87</identifier><description xsi:type="identifierDefinition" type="orcid">0000-0002-8548-5240</description></name>







<name type="corporate">
  <namePart></namePart>
  <identifier type="local">NiBa</identifier>
  <role>
    <roleTerm type="text">department</roleTerm>
  </role>
</name>








<abstract lang="eng">If distinct biological species are to coexist in sympatry, they must be reproductively isolated and must exploit different limiting resources. A two-niche Levene model is analysed, in which habitat preference and survival depend on underlying additive traits. The population genetics of preference and viability are equivalent. However, there is a linear trade-off between the chances of settling in either niche, whereas viabilities may be constrained arbitrarily. With a convex trade-off, a sexual population evolves a single generalist genotype, whereas with a concave trade-off, disruptive selection favours maximal variance. A pure habitat preference evolves to global linkage equilibrium if mating occurs in a single pool, but remarkably, evolves to pairwise linkage equilibrium within niches if mating is within those niches--independent of the genetics. With a concave trade-off, the population shifts sharply between a unimodal distribution with high gene flow and a bimodal distribution with strong isolation, as the underlying genetic variance increases. However, these alternative states are only simultaneously stable for a narrow parameter range. A sharp threshold is only seen if survival in the &apos;wrong&apos; niche is low; otherwise, strong isolation is impossible. Gene flow from divergent demes makes speciation much easier in parapatry than in sympatry.</abstract>

<originInfo><publisher>Royal Society</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>



<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences</title></titleInfo>
  <identifier type="MEDLINE">20439284</identifier>
  <identifier type="ISI">000277208600009</identifier><identifier type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2010.0001</identifier>
<part><detail type="volume"><number>365</number></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1547</number></detail><extent unit="pages">1825 - 1840</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>


<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<apa>Barton, N. H. (2010). What role does natural selection play in speciation? &lt;i&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;. Royal Society. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&lt;/a&gt;</apa>
<chicago>Barton, Nicholas H. “What Role Does Natural Selection Play in Speciation?” &lt;i&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;. Royal Society, 2010. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&lt;/a&gt;.</chicago>
<mla>Barton, Nicholas H. “What Role Does Natural Selection Play in Speciation?” &lt;i&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, vol. 365, no. 1547, Royal Society, 2010, pp. 1825–40, doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&quot;&gt;10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&lt;/a&gt;.</mla>
<ieee>N. H. Barton, “What role does natural selection play in speciation?,” &lt;i&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, vol. 365, no. 1547. Royal Society, pp. 1825–1840, 2010.</ieee>
<ama>Barton NH. What role does natural selection play in speciation? &lt;i&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;. 2010;365(1547):1825-1840. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&quot;&gt;10.1098/rstb.2010.0001&lt;/a&gt;</ama>
<ista>Barton NH. 2010. What role does natural selection play in speciation? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 365(1547), 1825–1840.</ista>
<short>N.H. Barton, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 365 (2010) 1825–1840.</short>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>3773</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2018-12-11T12:05:05Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-09-30T09:45:54Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
