{"citation":{"ama":"Henzinger TA, Manna Z, Pnueli A. Temporal proof methodologies for timed transition systems. Information and Computation. 1994;112(2):273-337. doi:10.1006/inco.1994.1060","apa":"Henzinger, T. A., Manna, Z., & Pnueli, A. (1994). Temporal proof methodologies for timed transition systems. Information and Computation. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1006/inco.1994.1060","chicago":"Henzinger, Thomas A, Zohar Manna, and Amir Pnueli. “Temporal Proof Methodologies for Timed Transition Systems.” Information and Computation. Elsevier, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1006/inco.1994.1060.","ieee":"T. A. Henzinger, Z. Manna, and A. Pnueli, “Temporal proof methodologies for timed transition systems,” Information and Computation, vol. 112, no. 2. Elsevier, pp. 273–337, 1994.","ista":"Henzinger TA, Manna Z, Pnueli A. 1994. Temporal proof methodologies for timed transition systems. Information and Computation. 112(2), 273–337.","short":"T.A. Henzinger, Z. Manna, A. Pnueli, Information and Computation 112 (1994) 273–337.","mla":"Henzinger, Thomas A., et al. “Temporal Proof Methodologies for Timed Transition Systems.” Information and Computation, vol. 112, no. 2, Elsevier, 1994, pp. 273–337, doi:10.1006/inco.1994.1060."},"abstract":[{"text":"We extend the specification language of temporal logic, the corresponding verification framework, and the underlying computational model to deal with real-;time properties of reactive systems. The abstract notion of timed transition systems generalizes traditional transition systems conservatively: qualitative fairness requirements are replaced (and superseded) by quantitative lower-bound and upper-bound timing constraints on transitions. This framework can model real-time systems that communicate either through shared variables or by message passing and real-time issues such as timeouts, process priorities (interrupts), and process scheduling. We exhibit two styles for the specification of real-time systems. While the first approach uses time-bounded versions of the temporal operators, the second approach allows explicit references to time through a special clock variable. Corresponding to the two styles of specification, we present and compare two different proof methodologies for the verification of timing requirements that are expressed in these styles. For the bounded-operator style, we provide a set of proof rules for establishing bounded-invariance and bounded-responce properties of timed transition systems. This approach generalizes the standard temporal proof rules for verifying invariance and response properties conservatively. For the explicit-clock style, we exploit the observation that every time-bounded property is a safety property and use the standard temporal proof rules for establishing safety properties.","lang":"eng"}],"title":"Temporal proof methodologies for timed transition systems","user_id":"ea97e931-d5af-11eb-85d4-e6957dddbf17","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"author":[{"id":"40876CD8-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","first_name":"Thomas A","orcid":"0000−0002−2985−7724","last_name":"Henzinger","full_name":"Henzinger, Thomas A"},{"first_name":"Zohar","full_name":"Manna, Zohar","last_name":"Manna"},{"full_name":"Pnueli, Amir","last_name":"Pnueli","first_name":"Amir"}],"publication_status":"published","issue":"2","article_type":"original","oa":1,"main_file_link":[{"url":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540184710601?via%3Dihub","open_access":"1"}],"volume":112,"acknowledgement":"This research was supported in part by an IBM graduate fellowship, by the National Science Foundation under Grants CCR-9223226 and CCR-9200794. by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract N00039-84-C-0211. by the United States Air Force OMee of Scientific Research under Contracts F49620-93-141139 and F4962043-1-0056. and by the European Community ESPRIT Basic Research Action Project 6021 (REACT). A preliminary version of Part 1 of this paper appeared in the proceedings of the 1991 REX Workshop on Real Time Theory In Prate [HMP92a I a preliminary version of Part II appeared in the proceedings of the 1991 ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages RIMP911. ","status":"public","publication":"Information and Computation","doi":"10.1006/inco.1994.1060","article_processing_charge":"No","date_created":"2018-12-11T12:09:10Z","publist_id":"227","date_published":"1994-08-01T00:00:00Z","intvolume":" 112","extern":"1","month":"08","quality_controlled":"1","oa_version":"None","date_updated":"2022-06-02T09:24:58Z","scopus_import":"1","type":"journal_article","day":"01","publication_identifier":{"issn":["0890-5401"]},"year":"1994","page":"273 - 337","_id":"4501","publisher":"Elsevier"}