<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/4517">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/4517"/>
        <dc:title>Sooner Is Safer Than Later</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>It has been observed repeatedly that the standard safety-liveness classification for properties of reactive systems does not fit for real-time properties. This is because the implicit “liveliness” of time shifts the spectrum towards the safety side. While, for example, response—that “something good” will happen eventually—is a classical liveness property, bounded response—that “something good” will happen soon, within a certain amount of time—has many characteristics of safety. We account for this phenomenon formally by defining safety and liveness relative to a given condition, such as the progress of time.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:volume>43</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:issue>3</bibo:issue>
        <bibo:startPage>135 - 141</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>135 - 141</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.1016/0020-0190(92)90005-G" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.1016/0020-0190(92)90005-G"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
