<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3">

<genre>conference paper</genre>

<titleInfo><title>Automating modular verification</title></titleInfo>

  
  
<titleInfo type="alternative">
  
  <title>LNCS</title>
</titleInfo>

<note type="publicationStatus">published</note>


<note type="qualityControlled">yes</note>

<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Rajeev</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Alur</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Luca</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">De Alfaro</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Thomas A</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Henzinger</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role><identifier type="local">40876CD8-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87</identifier><description xsi:type="identifierDefinition" type="orcid">0000−0002−2985−7724</description></name>
<name type="personal">
  <namePart type="given">Freddy</namePart>
  <namePart type="family">Mang</namePart>
  <role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm> </role></name>









<name type="conference">
  <namePart>CONCUR: Concurrency Theory</namePart>
</name>






<abstract lang="eng">Modular techniques for automatic verification attempt to overcome the state-explosion problem by exploiting the modular structure naturally present in many system designs. Unlike other tasks in the verification of finite-state systems, current modular techniques rely heavily on user guidance. In particular, the user is typically required to construct module abstractions that are neither too detailed as to render insufficient benefits in state exploration, nor too coarse as to invalidate the desired systemproperties. In this paper, we construct abstractmodules automatically, using reachability and controllability information about the concrete modules. This allows us to leverage automatic verification techniques by applying them in layers: first we compute on the state spaces of system components, then we use the results for constructing abstractions, and finally we compute on the abstract state space of the system. Our experimental results indicate that if reachability and controllability information is used in the construction of abstractions, the resulting abstract modules are often significantly smaller than the concrete modules and can drastically reduce the space and time requirements for verification.</abstract>

<originInfo><publisher>Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999</dateIssued><place><placeTerm type="text">Eindhoven, The Netherlands</placeTerm></place>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
</language>



<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory</title></titleInfo>
  <identifier type="isbn">9783540664253</identifier><identifier type="doi">10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8</identifier>
<part><detail type="volume"><number>1664</number></detail><extent unit="pages">82 - 97</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>

<note type="extern">yes</note>
<extension>
<bibliographicCitation>
<short>R. Alur, L. De Alfaro, T.A. Henzinger, F. Mang, in:, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 1999, pp. 82–97.</short>
<ieee>R. Alur, L. De Alfaro, T. A. Henzinger, and F. Mang, “Automating modular verification,” in &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory&lt;/i&gt;, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1999, vol. 1664, pp. 82–97.</ieee>
<ista>Alur R, De Alfaro L, Henzinger TA, Mang F. 1999. Automating modular verification. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory. CONCUR: Concurrency Theory, LNCS, vol. 1664, 82–97.</ista>
<apa>Alur, R., De Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T. A., &amp;#38; Mang, F. (1999). Automating modular verification. In &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory&lt;/i&gt; (Vol. 1664, pp. 82–97). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&lt;/a&gt;</apa>
<ama>Alur R, De Alfaro L, Henzinger TA, Mang F. Automating modular verification. In: &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory&lt;/i&gt;. Vol 1664. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik; 1999:82-97. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&quot;&gt;10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&lt;/a&gt;</ama>
<mla>Alur, Rajeev, et al. “Automating Modular Verification.” &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory&lt;/i&gt;, vol. 1664, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 1999, pp. 82–97, doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&quot;&gt;10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&lt;/a&gt;.</mla>
<chicago>Alur, Rajeev, Luca De Alfaro, Thomas A Henzinger, and Freddy Mang. “Automating Modular Verification.” In &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concurrency Theory&lt;/i&gt;, 1664:82–97. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 1999. &lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&quot;&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48320-9_8&lt;/a&gt;.</chicago>
</bibliographicCitation>
</extension>
<recordInfo><recordIdentifier>4602</recordIdentifier><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2018-12-11T12:09:42Z</recordCreationDate><recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2022-09-01T14:15:35Z</recordChangeDate>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
