<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/6232">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/6232"/>
        <dc:title>Boundary regularity of stochastic PDEs</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person>
                <foaf:name></foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname></foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname></foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>The boundary behaviour of solutions of stochastic PDEs with Dirichlet boundary conditions can be surprisingly—and in a sense, arbitrarily—bad: as shown by Krylov[ SIAM J. Math. Anal.34(2003) 1167–1182], for any α&gt;0 one can find a simple 1-dimensional constant coefficient linear equation whose solution at the boundary is not α-Hölder continuous.We obtain a positive counterpart of this: under some mild regularity assumptions on the coefficients, solutions of semilinear SPDEs on C1 domains are proved to be α-Hölder continuous up to the boundary with some α&gt;0.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:volume>47</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:issue>2</bibo:issue>
        <bibo:startPage>804-834</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>804-834</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>Institute of Mathematical Statistics</dc:publisher>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.1214/18-AOP1272" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.1214/18-AOP1272"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
