<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
<ListRecords>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
           xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
           xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
           xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
   	<dc:title>Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads</dc:title>
   	<dc:creator>Lenzen, Christoph</dc:creator>
   	<dc:creator>Rybicki, Joel ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-6646</dc:creator>
   	<dc:subject>ddc:000</dc:subject>
   	<dc:description>Consider a fully-connected synchronous distributed system consisting of n nodes, where up to f nodes may be faulty and every node starts in an arbitrary initial state. In the synchronous C-counting problem, all nodes need to eventually agree on a counter that is increased by one modulo C in each round for given C&amp;gt;1. In the self-stabilising firing squad problem, the task is to eventually guarantee that all non-faulty nodes have simultaneous responses to external inputs: if a subset of the correct nodes receive an external “go” signal as input, then all correct nodes should agree on a round (in the not-too-distant future) in which to jointly output a “fire” signal. Moreover, no node should generate a “fire” signal without some correct node having previously received a “go” signal as input. We present a framework reducing both tasks to binary consensus at very small cost. For example, we obtain a deterministic algorithm for self-stabilising Byzantine firing squads with optimal resilience f&amp;lt;n/3, asymptotically optimal stabilisation and response time O(f), and message size O(log f). As our framework does not restrict the type of consensus routines used, we also obtain efficient randomised solutions.</dc:description>
   	<dc:publisher>Springer</dc:publisher>
   	<dc:date>2018</dc:date>
   	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>doc-type:article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>article</dc:type>
   	<dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1</dc:type>
   	<dc:identifier>https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/record/76</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:identifier>https://research-explorer.ista.ac.at/download/76/5711</dc:identifier>
   	<dc:source>Lenzen C, Rybicki J. Near-optimal self-stabilising counting and firing squads. &lt;i&gt;Distributed Computing&lt;/i&gt;. 2018. doi:&lt;a href=&quot;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6&quot;&gt;10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6&lt;/a&gt;</dc:source>
   	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00446-018-0342-6</dc:relation>
   	<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/000475627800005</dc:relation>
   	<dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
</ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>
