{"conference":{"name":"ICALP: International Colloquium on Automota, Languages and Programming"},"date_created":"2018-12-11T11:48:28Z","oa":1,"month":"01","date_updated":"2023-02-23T13:18:11Z","user_id":"2DF688A6-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","publisher":"Springer","title":"Polylogarithmic-time leader election in population protocols","status":"public","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38","page":"479 - 491","day":"01","publication_status":"published","main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05745"}],"year":"2015","volume":9135,"intvolume":"      9135","date_published":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","extern":"1","acknowledgement":"Support is gratefully acknowledged from the National Science Foundation under grants CCF-1217921, CCF-1301926, and IIS-1447786, the Department of Energy under grant ER26116/DE-SC0008923, and the Oracle and Intel corporations.”","oa_version":"Preprint","citation":{"apa":"Alistarh, D.-A., &#38; Gelashvili, R. (2015). Polylogarithmic-time leader election in population protocols (Vol. 9135, pp. 479–491). Presented at the ICALP: International Colloquium on Automota, Languages and Programming, Springer. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38\">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38</a>","chicago":"Alistarh, Dan-Adrian, and Rati Gelashvili. “Polylogarithmic-Time Leader Election in Population Protocols,” 9135:479–91. Springer, 2015. <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38\">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38</a>.","ama":"Alistarh D-A, Gelashvili R. Polylogarithmic-time leader election in population protocols. In: Vol 9135. Springer; 2015:479-491. doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38\">10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38</a>","ista":"Alistarh D-A, Gelashvili R. 2015. Polylogarithmic-time leader election in population protocols. ICALP: International Colloquium on Automota, Languages and Programming vol. 9135, 479–491.","ieee":"D.-A. Alistarh and R. Gelashvili, “Polylogarithmic-time leader election in population protocols,” presented at the ICALP: International Colloquium on Automota, Languages and Programming, 2015, vol. 9135, pp. 479–491.","short":"D.-A. Alistarh, R. Gelashvili, in:, Springer, 2015, pp. 479–491.","mla":"Alistarh, Dan-Adrian, and Rati Gelashvili. <i>Polylogarithmic-Time Leader Election in Population Protocols</i>. Vol. 9135, Springer, 2015, pp. 479–91, doi:<a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38\">10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_38</a>."},"publist_id":"6877","author":[{"last_name":"Alistarh","full_name":"Alistarh, Dan-Adrian","first_name":"Dan-Adrian","id":"4A899BFC-F248-11E8-B48F-1D18A9856A87","orcid":"0000-0003-3650-940X"},{"first_name":"Rati","last_name":"Gelashvili","full_name":"Gelashvili, Rati"}],"abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Population protocols are networks of finite-state agents, interacting randomly, and updating their states using simple rules. Despite their extreme simplicity, these systems have been shown to cooperatively perform complex computational tasks, such as simulating register machines to compute standard arithmetic functions. The election of a unique leader agent is a key requirement in such computational constructions. Yet, the fastest currently known population protocol for electing a leader only has linear convergence time, and it has recently been shown that no population protocol using a constant number of states per node may overcome this linear bound. In this paper, we give the first population protocol for leader election with polylogarithmic convergence time, using polylogarithmic memory states per node. The protocol structure is quite simple: each node has an associated value, and is either a leader (still in contention) or a minion (following some leader). A leader keeps incrementing its value and “defeats” other leaders in one-to-one interactions, and will drop from contention and become a minion if it meets a leader with higher value. Importantly, a leader also drops out if it meets a minion with higher absolute value. While these rules are quite simple, the proof that this algorithm achieves polylogarithmic convergence time is non-trivial. In particular, the argument combines careful use of concentration inequalities with anti-concentration bounds, showing that the leaders’ values become spread apart as the execution progresses, which in turn implies that straggling leaders get quickly eliminated. We complement our analysis with empirical results, showing that our protocol converges extremely fast, even for large network sizes."}],"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"type":"conference","_id":"780","external_id":{"arxiv":["1502.05745"]}}