Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges
Fatichi S, Barbosa SM, Caporali E, Silva ME. 2009. Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 114(18), D18121.
Download (ext.)
Journal Article
| Published
| English
Scopus indexed
Author
Fatichi, SimoneISTA;
Barbosa, S. M.;
Caporali, E.;
Silva, M. E.
Abstract
The detection of a trend in a time series and the evaluation of its magnitude and statistical significance is an important task in geophysical research. This importance is amplified in climate change contexts, since trends are often used to characterize long‐term climate variability and to quantify the magnitude and the statistical significance of changes in climate time series, both at global and local scales. Recent studies have demonstrated that the stochastic behavior of a time series can change the statistical significance of a trend, especially if the time series exhibits long‐range dependence. The present study examines the trends in time series of daily average temperature recorded in 26 stations in the Tuscany region (Italy). In this study a new framework for trend detection is proposed. First two parametric statistical tests, the Phillips‐Perron test and the Kwiatkowski‐Phillips‐Schmidt‐Shin test, are applied in order to test for trend stationary and difference stationary behavior in the temperature time series. Then long‐range dependence is assessed using different approaches, including wavelet analysis, heuristic methods and by fitting fractionally integrated autoregressive moving average models. The trend detection results are further compared with the results obtained using nonparametric trend detection methods: Mann‐Kendall, Cox‐Stuart and Spearman's<jats:italic>ρ</jats:italic>tests. This study confirms an increase in uncertainty when pronounced stochastic behaviors are present in the data. Nevertheless, for approximately one third of the analyzed records, the stochastic behavior itself cannot explain the long‐term features of the time series, and a deterministic positive trend is the most likely explanation.
Publishing Year
Date Published
2009-09-27
Journal Title
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
Volume
114
Issue
18
Article Number
D18121
ISSN
eISSN
IST-REx-ID
Cite this
Fatichi S, Barbosa SM, Caporali E, Silva ME. Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2009;114(18). doi:10.1029/2009jd011960
Fatichi, S., Barbosa, S. M., Caporali, E., & Silva, M. E. (2009). Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011960
Fatichi, Simone, S. M. Barbosa, E. Caporali, and M. E. Silva. “Deterministic versus Stochastic Trends: Detection and Challenges.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. American Geophysical Union, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011960.
S. Fatichi, S. M. Barbosa, E. Caporali, and M. E. Silva, “Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 114, no. 18. American Geophysical Union, 2009.
Fatichi S, Barbosa SM, Caporali E, Silva ME. 2009. Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 114(18), D18121.
Fatichi, Simone, et al. “Deterministic versus Stochastic Trends: Detection and Challenges.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 114, no. 18, D18121, American Geophysical Union, 2009, doi:10.1029/2009jd011960.
All files available under the following license(s):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Link(s) to Main File(s)
Access Level
Open Access
