The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales
Storch D, Šizling A, Reif J, Polechova J, Šizlingová E, Gaston K. 2008. The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters. 11(8), 771–784.
Download
No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
DOI
Journal Article
| Published
Author
Storch,D.;
Šizling,A. L;
Reif,J.;
Polechova, JitkaISTA 
;
Šizlingová,E.;
Gaston,K. J
;
Šizlingová,E.;
Gaston,K. JPublishing Year
Date Published
2008-01-01
Journal Title
Ecology Letters
Volume
11
Issue
8
Page
771 - 784
IST-REx-ID
Cite this
Storch D, Šizling A, Reif J, Polechova J, Šizlingová E, Gaston K. The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters. 2008;11(8):771-784. doi:3817
Storch, D., Šizling, A., Reif, J., Polechova, J., Šizlingová, E., & Gaston, K. (2008). The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/3817
Storch, D., A. Šizling, J. Reif, Jitka Polechova, E. Šizlingová, and K. Gaston. “The Quest for a Null Model for Macroecological Patterns: Geometry of Species Distributions at Multiple Spatial Scales.” Ecology Letters. Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. https://doi.org/3817.
D. Storch, A. Šizling, J. Reif, J. Polechova, E. Šizlingová, and K. Gaston, “The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales,” Ecology Letters, vol. 11, no. 8. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 771–784, 2008.
Storch D, Šizling A, Reif J, Polechova J, Šizlingová E, Gaston K. 2008. The quest for a null model for macroecological patterns: geometry of species distributions at multiple spatial scales. Ecology Letters. 11(8), 771–784.
Storch, D., et al. “The Quest for a Null Model for Macroecological Patterns: Geometry of Species Distributions at Multiple Spatial Scales.” Ecology Letters, vol. 11, no. 8, Wiley-Blackwell, 2008, pp. 771–84, doi:3817.
Google Scholar