In pipes, turbulence sets in despite the linear stability of the laminar Hagen–Poiseuille flow. The Reynolds number ( ) for which turbulence first appears in a given experiment – the ‘natural transition point’ – depends on imperfections of the set-up, or, more precisely, on the magnitude of finite amplitude perturbations. At onset, turbulence typically only occupies a certain fraction of the flow, and this fraction equally is found to differ from experiment to experiment. Despite these findings, Reynolds proposed that after sufficiently long times, flows may settle to steady conditions: below a critical velocity, flows should (regardless of initial conditions) always return to laminar, while above this velocity, eddying motion should persist. As will be shown, even in pipes several thousand diameters long, the spatio-temporal intermittent flow patterns observed at the end of the pipe strongly depend on the initial conditions, and there is no indication that different flow patterns would eventually settle to a (statistical) steady state. Exploiting the fact that turbulent puffs do not age (i.e. they are memoryless), we continuously recreate the puff sequence exiting the pipe at the pipe entrance, and in doing so introduce periodic boundary conditions for the puff pattern. This procedure allows us to study the evolution of the flow patterns for arbitrary long times, and we find that after times in excess of advective time units, indeed a statistical steady state is reached. Although the resulting flows remain spatio-temporally intermittent, puff splitting and decay rates eventually reach a balance, so that the turbulent fraction fluctuates around a well-defined level which only depends on . In accordance with Reynolds’ proposition, we find that at lower (here 2020), flows eventually always resume to laminar, while for higher ( ), turbulence persists. The critical point for pipe flow hence falls in the interval of $2020 , which is in very good agreement with the recently proposed value of . The latter estimate was based on single-puff statistics and entirely neglected puff interactions. Unlike in typical contact processes where such interactions strongly affect the percolation threshold, in pipe flow, the critical point is only marginally influenced. Interactions, on the other hand, are responsible for the approach to the statistical steady state. As shown, they strongly affect the resulting flow patterns, where they cause ‘puff clustering’, and these regions of large puff densities are observed to travel across the puff pattern in a wave-like fashion.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
We also thank Philipp Maier and the IST Austria workshop for theirdedicated technical support
Vasudevan M, Hof B. The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2018;839:76-94. doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.923
Vasudevan, M., & Hof, B. (2018). The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.923
Vasudevan, Mukund, and Björn Hof. “The Critical Point of the Transition to Turbulence in Pipe Flow.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.923.
M. Vasudevan and B. Hof, “The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 839. Cambridge University Press, pp. 76–94, 2018.
Vasudevan M, Hof B. 2018. The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 839, 76–94.
Vasudevan, Mukund, and Björn Hof. “The Critical Point of the Transition to Turbulence in Pipe Flow.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 839, Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 76–94, doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.923.