Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination

Hu F, Rishishwar L, Sivadas A, Mitchell G, King J, Murphy T, Gilsdorf J, Mayer L, Wang X. 2016. Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 54(12), 3010–3017.


Journal Article | Published | English

Scopus indexed
Author
Hu, Fang; Rishishwar, Lavanya; Sivadas, Ambily; Mitchell, GabrielISTA; King, Jordan; Murphy, Timothy; Gilsdorf, Janet; Mayer, Leonard; Wang, Xin
Department
Abstract
Haemophilus haemolyticus has been recently discovered to have the potential to cause invasive disease. It is closely related to nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NT H. influenzae). NT H. influenzae and H. haemolyticus are often misidentified because none of the existing tests targeting the known phenotypes of H. haemolyticus are able to specifically identify H. haemolyticus. Through comparative genomic analysis of H. haemolyticus and NT H. influenzae, we identified genes unique to H. haemolyticus that can be used as targets for the identification of H. haemolyticus. A real-time PCR targeting purT (encoding phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase 2 in the purine synthesis pathway) was developed and evaluated. The lower limit of detection was 40 genomes/PCR; the sensitivity and specificity in detecting H. haemolyticus were 98.9% and 97%, respectively. To improve the discrimination of H. haemolyticus and NT H. influenzae, a testing scheme combining two targets (H. haemolyticus purT and H. influenzae hpd, encoding protein D lipoprotein) was also evaluated and showed 96.7% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity for the identification of H. haemolyticus and 92.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the identification of H. influenzae, respectively. The dual-target testing scheme can be used for the diagnosis and surveillance of infection and disease caused by H. haemolyticus and NT H. influenzae.
Publishing Year
Date Published
2016-12-01
Journal Title
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to ABCs for providing strains and the Bacterial Meningitis Laboratory for technical support.
Volume
54
Issue
12
Page
3010 - 3017
IST-REx-ID

Cite this

Hu F, Rishishwar L, Sivadas A, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016;54(12):3010-3017. doi:10.1128/JCM.01511-16
Hu, F., Rishishwar, L., Sivadas, A., Mitchell, G., King, J., Murphy, T., … Wang, X. (2016). Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01511-16
Hu, Fang, Lavanya Rishishwar, Ambily Sivadas, Gabriel Mitchell, Jordan King, Timothy Murphy, Janet Gilsdorf, Leonard Mayer, and Xin Wang. “Comparative Genomic Analysis of Haemophilus Haemolyticus and Nontypeable Haemophilus Influenzae and a New Testing Scheme for Their Discrimination.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01511-16.
F. Hu et al., “Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 12. American Society for Microbiology, pp. 3010–3017, 2016.
Hu F, Rishishwar L, Sivadas A, Mitchell G, King J, Murphy T, Gilsdorf J, Mayer L, Wang X. 2016. Comparative genomic analysis of Haemophilus haemolyticus and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and a new testing scheme for their discrimination. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 54(12), 3010–3017.
Hu, Fang, et al. “Comparative Genomic Analysis of Haemophilus Haemolyticus and Nontypeable Haemophilus Influenzae and a New Testing Scheme for Their Discrimination.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 12, American Society for Microbiology, 2016, pp. 3010–17, doi:10.1128/JCM.01511-16.
All files available under the following license(s):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]

Link(s) to Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access

Export

Marked Publications

Open Data ISTA Research Explorer

Search this title in

Google Scholar