Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields

Mombarg JSG, Vanlaer V, Das SB, Rieutord M, Aerts C, Bugnet LA, Mathis S, Reese DR, Ballot J. 2025. Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 704, A336.

Download
OA 2025_AstronomyAstrophysics_Mombarg.pdf 2.62 MB [Published Version]

Journal Article | Published | English

Scopus indexed
Author
Mombarg, J. S.G.; Vanlaer, V.; Das, Srijan BISTA ; Rieutord, M.; Aerts, C.; Bugnet, LisaISTA ; Mathis, S.; Reese, D. R.; Ballot, J.
Department
Abstract
Context. Asymmetries in the observed rotational splittings of a multiplet contain information about the star’s rotation profile and internal magnetic field. Moreover, the frequency regularities of multiplets can be used for mode identification. However, to exploit this information, highly accurate theoretical predictions are needed. Aims. We aim to quantify the difference in the predicted mode asymmetries between a 1D perturbative method and a 2D method that includes a 2D stellar structure model, which takes rotation into account. We then place these differences between 1D and 2D methods in the context of asteroseismic measurements of internal magnetic fields. We only focus on the asymmetries and not on possible additional frequency peaks that can arise when the magnetic and rotation axis are misaligned. Methods. We coupled the 1D pulsation codes GYRE and StORM to the 2D stellar structure code ESTER and compared the oscillation predictions with the results from the 2D TOP pulsation code. We focused on zero-age main-sequence models representative of rotating β Cephei pulsators spinning at up to 20 per cent of the critical Keplerian rotation rate. Specifically, we investigated low-radial-order gravity and pressure modes. Results. We find a generally good agreement between the oscillation frequencies resulting from the 1D and 2D pulsation codes. We report differences in predicted mode multiplet asymmetries of mostly below 0.06 d−1. Since the magnetic asymmetries are small compared to the differences in the rotational asymmetries resulting from the 1D and 2D predictions, accurate measurements of the magnetic field are in most cases challenging. Conclusions. Differences in the predicted mode asymmetries of a rotating star between 1D perturbative methods and 2D non-perturbative methods can greatly hinder accurate measurements of internal magnetic fields in main-sequence pulsators with low-order modes. Nevertheless, reasonably accurate measurements could be possible with npg ≥ 2 modes if the internal rotation is roughly below 10 per cent of the Keplerian critical rotation frequency for (aligned) magnetic fields of the order of a few hundred kilogauss. While the differences between the 1D and 2D frequency predictions are mostly too large for internal magnetic field detections, the rotational asymmetries predicted by StORM are in general accurate enough for asteroseismic modelling of the stellar rotation in main-sequence stars with identified low-order modes.
Publishing Year
Date Published
2025-12-19
Journal Title
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Acknowledgement
We thank the anonymous referee for their comments on the manuscript, Dario Fritzewski for providing the distribution of fractions of critical rotation for the β Cephei sample, and Zhao Guo for the discussions. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon Europe programme (Synergy Grant agreement N°101071505: 4D-STAR). While partially funded by the European Union, views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. V.V. acknowledges support from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) under grant agreement N°1156923N (PhD Fellowship). S.B.D. acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement N°101034413. L.B. gratefully acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon Europe programme (Calcifer; Starting Grant agreement N°101165631). J.B., M.R., S.M. and J.S.G.M have been supported by CNES, focused on the preparation of the PLATO mission. Computations with ESTER and TOP have made use of the HPC resources from the CALMIP supercomputing centre (Grant 2023-P0107). This research made use of the numpy (Harris et al. 2020) and matplotlib (Hunter 2007) Python software packages.
Volume
704
Article Number
A336
ISSN
eISSN
IST-REx-ID

Cite this

Mombarg JSG, Vanlaer V, Das SB, et al. Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2025;704. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557247
Mombarg, J. S. G., Vanlaer, V., Das, S. B., Rieutord, M., Aerts, C., Bugnet, L. A., … Ballot, J. (2025). Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields. Astronomy and Astrophysics. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557247
Mombarg, J. S.G., V. Vanlaer, Srijan B Das, M. Rieutord, C. Aerts, Lisa Annabelle Bugnet, S. Mathis, D. R. Reese, and J. Ballot. “Is a 1D Perturbative Method Sufficient for Asteroseismic Modelling of β Cephei Pulsators? Implications for Measurements of Rotation and Internal Magnetic Fields.” Astronomy and Astrophysics. EDP Sciences, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557247.
J. S. G. Mombarg et al., “Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 704. EDP Sciences, 2025.
Mombarg JSG, Vanlaer V, Das SB, Rieutord M, Aerts C, Bugnet LA, Mathis S, Reese DR, Ballot J. 2025. Is a 1D perturbative method sufficient for asteroseismic modelling of β Cephei pulsators? Implications for measurements of rotation and internal magnetic fields. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 704, A336.
Mombarg, J. S. G., et al. “Is a 1D Perturbative Method Sufficient for Asteroseismic Modelling of β Cephei Pulsators? Implications for Measurements of Rotation and Internal Magnetic Fields.” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 704, A336, EDP Sciences, 2025, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557247.
All files available under the following license(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Date Uploaded
2026-01-05
MD5 Checksum
d838b4783920c43b7cc866e9cf08b383


Export

Marked Publications

Open Data ISTA Research Explorer

Sources

arXiv 2511.09617

Search this title in

Google Scholar